Oscillating system (small board on a halfpipe)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the period of oscillation for a system consisting of a small mass on a halfpipe, which itself is oscillating on a frictionless surface. Participants explore various approaches, including energy methods and Lagrangian mechanics, while addressing the complexities introduced by the motion of the halfpipe.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using energy methods, proposing that three types of energy (rotational and translational) are involved in the system's oscillation.
  • Another participant introduces a potential equation involving gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy, hinting at the use of small angle approximations to simplify the analysis.
  • A question is raised regarding the inclusion of the halfpipe's kinetic energy, with a suggestion to consider the system as analogous to a physical pendulum.
  • Clarifications are made about the halfpipe's mass and its motion on a frictionless surface, emphasizing that it also oscillates.
  • Participants discuss the possibility of writing down the Lagrangian for the system and solving the equations of motion, although one participant notes they have not yet covered Lagrangian mechanics in their studies.
  • There is a suggestion to consider force components and their relationship to energy equations, with a focus on the interaction between the mass and the halfpipe.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about whether a purely energy-based solution could be achieved, considering the center of mass of the system.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the best approach to analyze the system, with some favoring energy methods and others suggesting Lagrangian mechanics. There is no consensus on the most effective method or the role of the halfpipe's motion in the analysis.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention assumptions such as small amplitude motion and the frictionless nature of the surfaces involved. The discussion reflects a range of mathematical and physical considerations that remain unresolved.

pinsky
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
Hello there!

I have a situation as follows:

[PLAIN]http://img821.imageshack.us/img821/4026/kuglananagibu.gif

I have to find the period of oscillation of the system. I've know how to set the equations for when solving the equations with forces, but am lost when trying to solve it with energy.

There is no friction between any of the surfaces.

My assumption is that there should be three energies interchanging here.

Rotationl energy of m (around the center of the circle with radius R)
[tex]W_{rot}=1/2 mR^2 \omega[/tex]

And translational energies of M and m.
[tex]W_{trans}=1/2 Mv^2 + 1/2m v^2\omega[/tex]

Any ideas where to go form here?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex]mgR(1-cos(\phi))+\frac{1}{2}mR^2{\omega}^2=c_0[/tex] with [tex]\omega=\frac{d\phi}{dt}[/tex].

You also might find usefull the trigonometric identity [tex]cos(\phi)=1-2sin^2(\frac{\phi}{2})[/tex]. If you consider small amplitudes then you can also take the approximation [tex]sin^2(\frac{\phi}{2})=(\frac{\phi}{2})^2[/tex]. If you use both you ll end up with a differential equation that doesn't look simple , yet it has solutions of the form [tex]\phi(t)=asin(bt)[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Why do you include the kinetic energy of the half-pipe, does it move?

What you have here is similar to a physical pendulum? Do a Google search,

"period of a pendulum large amplitude oscillation" or something like that.
 
Thank you for your replays.

I should have metnion more explicitely, the halfpipe has a constant mass M and lies on a frictionless surface. Therefor is also oscillates.
 
pinsky said:
Thank you for your replays.

I should have metnion more explicitely, the halfpipe has a constant mass M and lies on a frictionless surface. Therefor is also oscillates.


Can you assume small amplitude motion?
 
Can you write down the Lagrangian for this system, T - V, and then solve the Lagrange equations of motion? What textbook are you using?
 
pinsky said:
Thank you for your replays.

I should have metnion more explicitely, the halfpipe has a constant mass M and lies on a frictionless surface. Therefor is also oscillates.

Hm now it becomes really interesting. You have to add [tex]\frac{1}{2}(M+m)v^2[/tex] to the left hand side of the equation(i guess M oscilates horizontaly so his potential energy doesn't change). But apparently we need one more equation and i can think only one that uses forces though. If [tex]F_n[/tex] is the force between m and M then [tex]F_n-mgcos(\phi)=m{\omega}^2R[/tex] and [tex]F_nsin(\phi)=M\frac{dv}{dt}[/tex]
 
Spinnor said:
Can you assume small amplitude motion?

Yes.

Spinnor said:
Can you write down the Lagrangian for this system, T - V, and then solve the Lagrange equations of motion? What textbook are you using?

I'm not on Lagrangian mechanics yet, it's first year physics.

Delta² said:
Hm now it becomes really interesting. You have to add [tex]\frac{1}{2}(M+m)v^2[/tex] to the left hand side of the equation(i guess M oscilates horizontaly so his potential energy doesn't change). But apparently we need one more equation and i can think only one that uses forces though. If [tex]F_n[/tex] is the force between m and M then [tex]F_n-mgcos(\phi)=m{\omega}^2R[/tex] and [tex]F_nsin(\phi)=M\frac{dv}{dt}[/tex]

Shouldn't there also be a force component of the system force on the board? (Due to the acceleration of the halfpipe).

I don't see how including forces into energy equations could help. Maybe they could be connected by

Wk = x F (for the kinetic energy of the halfpipe)

it's just, I've never seen a scenario in which those two interact. Could there a purely energy solution be found by using the center of mass? Or perhaps that the center of mass doesn't move in the x direction?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K