Oscillator using ad829 works - trying to make it work using 741

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around the challenges of creating a triangle wave oscillator using the AD829 op-amp and substituting it with the slower 741 op-amp to achieve a frequency of 30 kHz. Users suggest alternatives such as the TL071 and LF356 op-amps, noting the importance of adjusting resistor values (specifically R2 to 20K) to optimize performance. The conversation highlights the necessity of understanding slew rate limitations and the implications of using different op-amps in a buck converter circuit, particularly regarding output amplitude and stability.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of op-amp configurations and characteristics (e.g., AD829, 741, TL071, LF356)
  • Knowledge of oscillator design principles, particularly triangle wave generation
  • Familiarity with buck converter topology and control systems
  • Basic grasp of resistor-capacitor (RC) timing circuits and their impact on frequency
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specifications and performance characteristics of TL071 and LF356 op-amps
  • Learn about calculating slew rates for non-sinusoidal inputs in op-amp circuits
  • Explore the design and implementation of PI controllers in buck converters
  • Investigate the use of high-side MOSFET drivers like IR2011 for improved circuit performance
USEFUL FOR

Electronics engineers, hobbyists designing oscillators, and those working on buck converter projects will benefit from this discussion, particularly in optimizing op-amp selection and circuit design for specific frequency and amplitude requirements.

  • #31
FOIWATER said:
Jony Would you suggest a single sided supply, and a sawtooth oscillator?
Yes, you can use single supply and to simplify the circuit you can use sawtooth oscillator instead of a triangle gen.
I need so many op amps, because I am controlling the output of the buck converter. Two of them are for the oscillator, and four are for the PI controller (one subtractor, one summer, one proportional gain, and one integral gain) finally the LM311 to compare the PI signal to the oscillator signal... I am not sure how else to do it.
All you need is triangle/sawtooth oscillator, error amplifier and the comparator.
I am not sure how bootstrapping would help me..
IR4427 is a low side driver, but in your buck converter IRF520 work as a high side switch.
And this is why you need high side driver. Because now the voltage at MOSFET source cannot reach 28V. The max voltage you will get at source is 5V - Vgs ≈ 2V
So your buck converter will not work as you want. Also L1 value don't look right for such a low oscillator frequency.
 

Attachments

  • a.PNG
    a.PNG
    24 KB · Views: 485
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
I picked the values for the inductor and capacitor based on the formula ripple = Vo*(1-D)(Ts)^2/8LC Using a output ripple of 1% and a 50% duty cycle. But also the change in output current is given by (Vs-V0)DTs/L So I can size L and then choose C accordingly based on the first formula. I got these formulas from Mohan:Power Electronic converters textbook. I can see how they were derived.

I am not sure what you mean about the mosfet driver being a low side driver vs the mosfet being a high side switch? pardon my lack of knowledge..

As for the abundance of amplifiers - I need to utilize PI control

I really appreciate the replies.
 
  • #33
I am not sure what you mean about the mosfet driver being a low side driver vs the mosfet being a high side switch? pardon my lack of knowledge..
Simply, in your circuit the mosfet work as source follower and that means that the voltage at mosfet source (left side of a inductor) voltage cannot be larger then 5V-Vgs.
As for the abundance of amplifiers - I need to utilize PI control
But you can build PI controller using only one op amp.

I picked the values for the inductor and capacitor based on the formula ripple = Vo*(1-D)(Ts)^2/8LC Using a output ripple of 1% and a 50% duty cycle. But also the change in output current is given by (Vs-V0)DTs/L So I can size L and then choose C accordingly based on the first formula. I got these formulas from Mohan:Power Electronic converters textbook. I can see how they were derived.
For which Vo =?? and I_load =?
 
Last edited:
  • #34
Vo as 20 v I load as 4 A

I understand about the op amp now.

Sure I understand now, this driver needs a higher voltage, right?

But it's only rated for 20,
 
Last edited:
  • #35
I have a high side driver available. IR2011.

If I replace the driver with IR2011, I can only supply it with 20v according to the specification sheets.

Does this mean, if I want to buck 28 volts to 20, I NEED to use a bootstraping technique?
 
Last edited:
  • #36
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #37
I need a high input to turn on the mosfet. This seems like a different scenario, no?

I guess.. a high signal IS technically turning on the mosfet.. but it's a low signal from the driver which accomplishes it?
 
Last edited:
  • #38
This circuit will do the job
 

Attachments

  • 3.PNG
    3.PNG
    18 KB · Views: 449
  • #39
I wouldn't feel right using it outright. But I will try my best to learn from it. Thanks, Jony

Do these circuits eliminate the need for a driver??

I am lost here
 
  • #41
How about if I use a separate supply for the driver and ground the source of the MOSFET.

If this will work, will 5 volts be enough?
 
  • #42
You want to use a floating power supply for a MOSFET ?
 
  • #43
for the driver, will that work?
 
  • #44
If you don't want to use this discrete MOSFET driver. I think you should try to use IR2011. You can power it from 12V power supply you already have in your design.
 
  • #45
Really.. but as you said, 12 volts to the gate of the MOSFET will not allow me to have 28 volts at the source?

I will have 12 - Vgs only, no?

I don't think I understand drivers
 
  • #46
But IR2011 has high side driver with external diode and capacitor. And this will boost the gate voltage up to
28V + 12V.
 
Last edited:
  • #47
I did not know this thanks Jony
 

Similar threads

Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
13K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K