Otimes notation and tau matrices used in definition of gamma matrices?

Peeter
Messages
303
Reaction score
3
In Zee's Quantum Field theory book he writes

\begin{align}\gamma^0 &= \begin{bmatrix}I & 0 \\ 0 & -I\end{bmatrix}=I \otimes \tau_3 \\ \gamma^i &= \begin{bmatrix}0 & \sigma^i \\ \sigma^i & 0\end{bmatrix}=\sigma^i \otimes \tau_2 \\ \gamma^5 &=\begin{bmatrix}0 & I \\ I & 0\end{bmatrix}=I \otimes \tau_1 \end{align}

The Pauli matrices \sigma^i I've seen. However, I have two questions

1) What are these \tau_i matrices?
2) I'm not familiar with this \otimes notation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
strangerep said:
Try Wiki:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tensor_product#Kronecker_product_of_two_matrices

That should also allow you to reverse-engineer the tau matrices... :-)

I find that the tau matrices are just the sigma matrices. Odd that two different notations would be used. One notation when defining the gamma matrices in terms sigmas directly, and an entirely different notation when using the tensor product?
 
Peeter said:
I find that the tau matrices are just the sigma matrices.
... which is what Zee says beneath his eq(4) on p90.

Odd that two different notations would be used. One notation when defining the gamma matrices in terms sigmas directly, and an entirely different notation when using the tensor product?

I don't use tau's myself.

BTW, your earlier expression for gamma^i doesn't match Zee's.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top