Our Beautiful Universe - Photos and Videos

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This forum discussion centers on the beauty of the Universe, inviting members to share videos, photos, and animations of space. Key contributions include clips such as "The Astounding Fact About The Universe" by Neil Degrasse Tyson and time-lapse footage from the ISS. The discussion emphasizes adherence to mainstream scientific principles, avoiding fringe theories. Notable mentions include NASA's New Horizons mission to Pluto and the Millennium Simulation by the Max Planck Institute, showcasing the vastness and intricacies of cosmic phenomena.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mainstream astrophysics concepts
  • Familiarity with NASA missions, particularly New Horizons and Dawn
  • Knowledge of astrophotography techniques
  • Basic comprehension of astronomical simulations like the Millennium Simulation
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore NASA's New Horizons mission updates and findings
  • Research the Millennium Simulation Project and its implications for cosmology
  • Learn about the techniques used in astrophotography for capturing celestial images
  • Investigate the Digital Universe software from the Hayden Planetarium for interactive space exploration
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy enthusiasts, astrophotographers, educators, and anyone interested in the visual representation of cosmic phenomena will benefit from this discussion.

  • #1,411
collinsmark said:
This is my most ambitious astrophotography project thus far: a time-lapse video of Jupiter.
Stunning and impressive! Congratulations again!
:partytime:
collinsmark said:
I do think the end result is worth the effort, but it did take a lot of effort. If you're looking to do this sort of thing yourself, make sure you enter into it with a lot of patience and free time. To be frank: it took a lot of work.
I can imagine!
I think I've posted a similar project a couple of people did with Jupiter quite some time ago, but I can't find the post at the moment.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #1,412
I got a link from a friend to this site with cool gear for mobile astrophotography: :smile: TrailerDomes.

TrailerDomes-ObservationMode.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, Keith_McClary, Borg and 2 others
  • #1,413
Hello, I send two Jupiter images from yesterday, this time with mobile camera {Huawei Y6} adapted to eyepiece 8 mm {telescope skywatcher 600 x 200mm].:smile::wideeyed::wideeyed:
 

Attachments

  • Jupiter 3.gif
    Jupiter 3.gif
    3 KB · Views: 160
  • Jupiter 4.gif
    Jupiter 4.gif
    3.7 KB · Views: 146
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chemisttree, collinsmark, davenn and 2 others
  • #1,414
14mm, f/2.8, 400iso, 120sec, full frame sensor, moonless bortle 2, shasta county, california, usa

https://www.speakev.com/attachments/img-3033-gif.149501/
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: BvU, collinsmark, Ibix and 3 others
  • #1,415
Hello, I send three Saturn images again made with mobile camera {Huawei Y6} adapted to eyepiece 8 mm {telescope skywatcher 600 x 200mm] and little GIMP corrected. :wideeyed: :smile:
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20210904_225926G.jpg
    IMG_20210904_225926G.jpg
    1.8 KB · Views: 133
  • IMG_20210904_225926G2.jpg
    IMG_20210904_225926G2.jpg
    1.8 KB · Views: 138
  • IMG_20210904_225926G.jpg
    IMG_20210904_225926G.jpg
    1.8 KB · Views: 159
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chemisttree, collinsmark, davenn and 1 other person
  • #1,416
in my last image I'm seeing what appears to be a cloud of dust drifting away to the left from a meteor entry... upper middle frame...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark
  • #1,417
still saturn -these two are better.. I hope :smile: :wideeyed:
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20210904_230137GGG.jpg
    IMG_20210904_230137GGG.jpg
    1.8 KB · Views: 159
  • IMG_20210904_230137GGGG.jpg
    IMG_20210904_230137GGGG.jpg
    1.7 KB · Views: 150
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chemisttree, collinsmark and DennisN
  • #1,418
One of the panoramas I have been working on within the Cygnus constellation- this one is in the neighborhood of γ Cygni, centered on the Crescent nebula (NGC 6888), using my 400/2.8 lens:

g_Cygni-St-74143s copy.jpg

Everything (stacking, corrections, mosaic assembly) was done in Astro Pixel Processor, the original is 13781 x 15138 pixels.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, Borg, collinsmark and 1 other person
  • #1,419
bruha said:
still saturn -these two are better.. I hope
Many of your latest photos of Saturn look very sharp and nice to me. Are you taking multiple photos and then stacking them in a stacking software?

Maybe you already know this, but I want to say there's also the possibility to film a planet, and then produce a photo by stacking the frames of the film automatically. When I was using my mobile phone, I got better results when filming than taking photos (perhaps because there were more frames to stack in the films). When I did this I selected the maximum resolution and maximium fps (frames/second) possible for recording video in the app OpenCamera.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark
  • #1,420
So here’s a closeup of what I think is a meteor entry turning into a visible cloud of dust… each frame is 2 minutes so this spans about 10 minutes… can anyone think of a different explanation? spaceship coming out of hyperdrive?https://www.speakev.com/attachments/c182a72b-7379-43df-8720-52e7cc88887c-gif.149567/
 
Last edited:
  • Wow
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN and collinsmark
  • #1,421
Hello, thank you
my images are just simple single photos- last two are made by PRO mode of standard camera within Huawei mobile. (adjusting just ISO and exp. time) and little sharpening and denoising in GIMP.
But thank you for advice, next time I will try this procedure. :thumbup: :smile: :smile:
Thanks and lot of succes
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN
  • #1,422
Hallo, can I ask how you generate photo sequence from the recorded film {with Open Camera] as you mentioned ?
Thank you :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN
  • #1,423
bruha said:
Hallo, can I ask how you generate photo sequence from the recorded film {with Open Camera] as you mentioned ?
For that I use a software called PIPP (Planetary Imaging Preprocessor). Downloadable here.

Stacking:

For stacking I currently use AutoStakkert. Downloadable here.

If you haven't stacked images before, here's a very brief guide for using AutoStakkert:
https://www.astrokraai.nl/tut/guide_dennis_put.htm

There are more guides available here: https://www.autostakkert.com/wp/guides/

AutoStakkert can also take a movie clip directly and stack it. I currently don't remember exactly which video formats it supports (e.g. mp4 etc), so when doing this it's a good idea to check that the camera is recording in a suitable video format.

Good luck! :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark
  • #1,424
Thank you very much and good luck you to :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN
  • #1,426
Keith_McClary said:
Would that have been in sunlight?
altitude of between about 80 to 120 km
I'm not sure it would be in sunlight, it was about 11:21pm on 9/5/21 in Shasta County, California, USA

Here it is processed at a bit higher resolution... This is 6 frames so spans 12 minutes.

https://www.speakev.com/attachments/img-3077-gif.149668/
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark
  • #1,427
Here's the other panorama in Cygnus I've been assembling, this one of the North America Nebula and surroundings:

North_America_Nebula-mod-St-46475s copy.jpg


This is nearly a 2 x 2 mosaic using a 400/2.8 lens (full frame), original size is 9334 x 8985 pixels, all stacking and post-processing done in Astro Pixel Processor.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark and DennisN
  • #1,428
Devin-M said:
I'm not sure it would be in sunlight, it was about 11:21pm on 9/5/21 in Shasta County, California, USA

Here it is processed at a bit higher resolution... This is 6 frames so spans 12 minutes.

<snip video>
I'd be interested in seeing what the 'difference image' video would look like. By 'difference images', I mean post-processing the video file so that each frame (say frame 'i') is the difference between frame 'i' and frame 'i-1'. It's a quick and easy way to get rid of static features and emphasize changes that occur from one frame to the next.
 
  • #1,429
Andy Resnick said:
I'd be interested in seeing what the 'difference image' video would look like. By 'difference images', I mean post-processing the video file so that each frame (say frame 'i') is the difference between frame 'i' and frame 'i-1'. It's a quick and easy way to get rid of static features and emphasize changes that occur from one frame to the next.
Here you go:
https://www.speakev.com/attachments/1-gif.149732/
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, Andy Resnick, bruha and 3 others
  • #1,430
I’m not sure whether I’m seeing infrared light activating the red pixels directly from the hot dust and gas or light pollution from the ground reflecting off the dust or perhaps a combination of both…?
 
  • #1,431
The Helix Nebula (NGC 7293) is a planetary nebula (nothing really to do with planets though) some 650 light-years away, in the constellation Aquarius. It's composed of the remnants of a dying star that was once quite like our Sun.

Captured between 2021-08-27 and 2021-09-13.
Total Integration time: 7.81 hours

HelixNebula2021.jpg


This is the first deep-sky object I've imaged in around 11 years. Technology has sure changed. I'm getting used to some new software and new equipment (well, new to me anyway). Plenty of mistakes were made, and plenty of lessons learned.

The Helix Nebula presents several challenges for me. I live in very light polluted skies (Bortle Class 8), and the Helix Nebula is not particularly bright, even though it is considered a "bright," planetary nebula.

From my vantage point, when not blocked by obstacles, it is fairly low to the horizon in the South-Southwest [in the direction of Mordor]. That's right where there's a ton of glare from neighborhood lights and also the same direction as the city skyglow [and let's not forget about evil forces and fiery Mt. Doom in Mordor]. Even with a telescope and an appropriate eyepiece, I probably couldn't even see it visually without of a long exposure camera [unless of course I slipped on the precious and entered the wraith-world, but that brings about its own issues].

In addition to the light-pollution, I also faced a broken-record's worth of coastal eddies that boosted the marine layer (resulting in clouds and haze); smoke from regional fires (I'm not even making that one up); [a gang of orcs]; guiding problems; the frustration of switching mid-project from a cheap guide-scope to an off-axis guider (OAG); [a nazgûl, but fortunately just the one (1 out of 9 max)]; tracking errors (oh, god the tracking errors -- my scope's gears could use a tune-up); A freak downpour that's practically unheard of in San Diego, California [or Hobbiton, The Shire], and some software compatibility weirdness.

------- Acquisition and processing details -------------

Equipment:
Meade 10" LX200-ACF (telescope)
Optec Lepus 0.62 Telecompressor
Astronomik RGB filters
Astronomik narrowband filters (SII, Hα, Oiii)
ZWO ASI1600MM (camera)
(various guiding equipment, not mentioned here.)

Software:
Nightime Imaging 'N' Astronomy (N.I.N.A.)
PixInsight
Topaz Denoise AI
Gnu Imaging Manipulation Program (GIMP)

Something of note is the flat frames were taken using a couple of white T-shirts (undershirts), a 14" embroidery ring, and a cheap, portable artists' "light box" used for sketching/tracing. The neat thing about that is the most expensive part was the bag of T-shirts.

The breakdown of filter integration is as follows (this only includes the "good" subframes, which were only about 50% of the total):
SII: 2.64 hours
Hα: 1.82 hours
Oiii: 1.58 hours
R: 0.56 hours
G: 0.56 hours
B: 0.65 hours
If you're wondering why there's so much more SII instead of Hα or Oiii, it's because the SII night was the about the only night the weather was cooperating.

Most of the processing was done in PixInsight. I'm brand new to PixInsight, so I'll spare you the details, since my workflow was all over the place. Suffice it to say, after calibrating, integrating, stretching and some color corrections, the color channels were combined using the PixelMath process in the following way:
Red Channel: 0.2R + 0.8Hα
Green Channel: 0.2G + 0.8Oiii
Blue Channel: 0.2B + 0.8SII

I think it came out okay, all things considered. But I look forward to improvements when I revisit the Helix Nebula in the coming years. [And I think all-in-all, the Dark Lord Sauron would be pleased.]
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: Andy Resnick, DennisN, Bystander and 2 others
  • #1,432
That’s a very very nice acquisition and worth a poster-print. I just got my first large size astro-print mounted on the wall yesterday…

248F8383-0652-4E06-A624-38940F927C23.jpeg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN, Keith_McClary and collinsmark
  • #1,433
I did some saturn imaging last night with a 300mm f/4.5 nikon lens + tc-301 nikon 2x teleconverter for effective 600mm f/9 with 1000iso and 1/160th second exposures on a nikon d800 full frame sensor dslr, no tracking, exposures 7 seconds apart..

https://www.speakev.com/attachments/dsc_3510-2-gif.150133/

https://www.speakev.com/attachments/dsc_3510-gif.150134/

20 images stacked and enlarged via interpolation:

saturn_stacked.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chemisttree and Keith_McClary
  • #1,434
this is what I get after converting just the green channel to monochrome with 20 stacked 16-bit tifs (600mm f/9 1/160th sec 1000iso):

https://www.speakev.com/attachments/saturn_stacked_mono_green2-gif.150147/
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN and Keith_McClary
  • #1,435
Hello, it is very nice, :thumbup: :thumbup: which software you use for green channel converting?
Thank you :smile:
 
  • #1,436
bruha said:
Hello, it is very nice, :thumbup: :thumbup: which software you use for green channel converting?
Thank you :smile:

First I histogram stretched and cropped 20 RAW image files in Adobe Lightroom and exported them to 16-bit TIF files. Next I stacked them in Lynkeos to a 16-bit TIF. Then in Adobe Photoshop I copied the green channel and pasted it into the red and blue channels. Then back in Adobe Lightroom I did some final histogram stretching to the 16 bit TIF. Then back in Adobe Photoshop I did some final cropping and upscaled the image with interpolation before finally exporting as a GIF file. This was the camera I used but the tracking mount was turned off. Nikon D800 DSLR with a Nikon 300mm f/4.5 lens and a Nikon TC-301 2x teleconverter for effective 600mm f/9.

1B530DE1-D883-4624-9722-8726D6A586B1.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN, collinsmark and Keith_McClary
  • #1,437
Ok, thank you I understand.
Lot of succes :thumbup: :smile:
 
  • #1,438
ISS Flyover - Whiskeytown, California, USA - 7:54pm - 8:00pm 10/4/21 - 6 min, 100 iso, f/4, 14mm, full frame sensor, uncropped, eq mount, moonless Bortle 4

https://www.speakev.com/attachments/img-4506-gif.150765/
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chemisttree, collinsmark, Keith_McClary and 1 other person
  • #1,439
https://www.speakev.com/attachments/img-4509-gif.150766/
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark, Ibix and DennisN
  • #1,440
4EDCF059-F6EE-4857-AF52-3CAD119A8F16.jpeg


E4C39C8A-9E17-4588-AFC1-B5ADB198CBA8.jpeg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark, Keith_McClary and DennisN

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K