Cosmology What Are The Best Books To Study Cosmology?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Figaro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Books Cosmology
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on selecting appropriate cosmology textbooks for undergraduate and graduate studies. Participants recommend "Introduction to Cosmology" by Barbara Ryden as a solid choice, while questioning whether "Cosmology" by Roos is suitable for undergraduates or too basic. The importance of updated editions is highlighted, with Roos' 4th edition from 2015 being noted as more current than Ryden's 2002 edition, though a new edition of Ryden's book is forthcoming. Additionally, there is interest in the lecture notes by Daniel Baumann for advanced study, and a specific equation related to inflation in those notes prompts a technical inquiry. Overall, the thread emphasizes the need for a structured approach to studying cosmology through well-regarded resources.
Figaro
Messages
103
Reaction score
7
Hi, I'm currently in my last year of undergraduate degree, I have a basic knowledge of GR (A. Zee) but I have a very limited knowledge of cosmology, I did not cover the cosmology portion of Zee's book as it is too superficial and I don't want to waste my time reading that. I think my time will be better off at reading proper cosmology books. Based on my searches, Cosmology by Harrison is a good starter but is it an undergrad book or too easy in that respect? Is Cosmology by Roos good for undergrad? For grad school Dodelson? Can anybody guide me on the proper outline of books for cosmology?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I like "Introduction to Cosmology" by Barbara Ryden
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0805389121/?tag=pfamazon01-20

and, at a little higher level, Daniel Baumann's lecture notes for a course that he taught at Cambridge
http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/db275/Cosmology/Lectures.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes CalcNerd and QuantumQuest
George Jones said:
I like "Introduction to Cosmology" by Barbara Ryden
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0805389121/?tag=pfamazon01-20

and, at a little higher level, Daniel Baumann's lecture notes for a course that he taught at Cambridge
http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/db275/Cosmology/Lectures.pdf
Ryden's book was published in 2002, while Roos' have a 4th edition last (2015), do you think that is a major plus? 13 years seems to have a lot of change in Cosmology.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Figaro said:
Ryden's book was published in 2002, while Roos' have a 4th edition last (2015), do you think that is a major plus? 13 years seems to have a lot of change in Cosmology.

The Amazon page for Roos 4e has a "Look Inside" preview which includes the preface, which outlines the changes from the third edition.
 
I really liked Rydens book, I have not looked into Roos but I have the 3rd edition though. If you have the time to wait, then perhaps Ryden is the best?
 
malawi_glenn said:
I really liked Rydens book, I have not looked into Roos but I have the 3rd edition though. If you have the time to wait, then perhaps Ryden is the best?
Thanks for your suggestions but what is the standard outline in studying cosmology? From undergrad to grad.
 
u may read the mechanical universe by Goodstein
 
  • #10
George Jones said:
I like "Introduction to Cosmology" by Barbara Ryden
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0805389121/?tag=pfamazon01-20

and, at a little higher level, Daniel Baumann's lecture notes for a course that he taught at Cambridge
http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/db275/Cosmology/Lectures.pdf
That is a very good lecture notes, but I have a question on page 31 equation (2.1.6) on inflation, since the energy density ##ρ(a)## and the scale ##a## is related by ##ρ(a) ∝ a^{-3(1+w)}##, he said that the comoving Hubble radius is given by (for a universe dominated by a fluid with constant equation of state)
##(aH)^{-1} = H_o^{-1} a^{\frac{1+3w}{2}}##. How did he get this relation?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
Figaro said:
That is a very good lecture notes, but I have a question on page 31 equation (2.1.6) on inflation, since the energy density ##ρ(a)## and the scale ##a## is related by ##ρ(a) ∝ a^{-3(1+w)}##, he said that the comoving Hubble radius is given by (for a universe dominated by a fluid with constant equation of state)
##(aH)^{-1} = H_o^{-1} a^{\frac{1+3w}{2}}##. How did he get this relation?

Multiply equation (1.3.136),
$$H = H_0 \sqrt{\Omega}a^{-\frac{3}{2} \left( 1 + w \right)},$$
by the scale factor ##a##, and note that for a (spatially) flat universe, ##\Omega = 1##.
 
  • #12
George Jones said:
Multiply equation (1.3.136),
$$H = H_0 \sqrt{\Omega}a^{-\frac{3}{2} \left( 1 + w \right)},$$
by the scale factor ##a##, and note that for a (spatially) flat universe, ##\Omega = 1##.
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Back
Top