OWhat is the product of these permutations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Firepanda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Permutations
AI Thread Summary
To find the product of the permutations p1 = (1 5)(2 4 6 3) and p2 = (1 3 7 4)(2)(5 8 6), the correct approach is to apply p1 first, followed by p2. The calculations show that p2 * p1 results in the cycle (1 8)(2 1 8)(3 2 1 8)(4 5 3 2 1 8)(6 7), which simplifies to (4 5 3 2 1 8)(6 7). The discussion also highlights the importance of identifying cycles and how to represent permutations as products of transpositions. Ultimately, the final representation of the permutations can vary based on the method used, but the calculations confirm the correctness of the derived cycles.
Firepanda
Messages
425
Reaction score
0
I don't have any example of this in my notes:

I have the permutation p1 = (1 5)(2 4 6 3)

and the permutation p2 = (1 3 7 4)(2)(5 8 6)

and I have to find p2 * p1

i THINK you take it in the form p1 then p2, like:


(1 5)(2 4 6 3)(1 3 7 4)(2)(5 8 6) = ...

But them I'm stuck.

I tried googling some info, but it was all too vague.

I had an attempt which ended up in:

1 -> 5 in p1, then 5 -> 8 in p2 so 1 -> 8

etc

so p2*p1 = (1 8)(2 1 8)(3 2 1 8)(4 5 3 2 1 8)(6 7)

= (4 5 3 2 1 8)(6 7)

Looks right? :P
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Firepanda said:
I don't have any example of this in my notes:

I have the permutation p1 = (1 5)(2 4 6 3)

and the permutation p2 = (1 3 7 4)(2)(5 8 6)

and I have to find p2 * p1

i THINK you take it in the form p1 then p2, like:


(1 5)(2 4 6 3)(1 3 7 4)(2)(5 8 6) = ...

But them I'm stuck.

I tried googling some info, but it was all too vague.

I had an attempt which ended up in:

1 -> 5 in p1, then 5 -> 8 in p2 so 1 -> 8

etc

so p2*p1 = (1 8)(2 1 8)(3 2 1 8)(4 5 3 2 1 8)(6 7)

= (4 5 3 2 1 8)(6 7)

Looks right? :P
Take it "one step at a time". p2 is (1 3 7 4)(2)(5 8 6) and p1 is (1 5)(2 4 6 3).
p1 takes 1 to 5 and then p2 takes 5 to 8: together p1p2 takes 1 to 8.
p1 takes 2 to 4 and then p2 takes 4 to 1: p1p2 takes 2 to 1.
p1 takes 3 to 2 and then p2 takes does not change 2: p1p2 takes 3 to 2.
p1 takes 4 to 6 and then p2 takes 6 to 5: p1p2 takes 4 to 5.
p1 takes 5 to 1 and then p1 takes 1 to 3: p1p2 takes 5 to 3.
p1 takes 6 to 3 and then p2 takes 2 to 7: p1p2 take 6 to 7
p1 does not change 7 but p2 takes 7 to 4: p1p2 takes 7 to 4
p1 does not change 8 but p2 takes 8 to 6: p1p2 takes 8 to 6
(That's how I am interpreting the fact that neither 7 nor 8 appear in the definition of p1.)

Now look for cycles: 1 changes to 8 which changes to 6 which changes to 7 which changes to 4 which changes to 5 which changes to 3 which changes to 2 which changes to 1: a cycle is (18674532). Since that includes every number from 1 to 8, p1p2 is that cycle: p1p2= (18674532).
 
I just tried to comnpute p2*p2

(1 3 7 4)(2)(5 8 6)(1 3 7 4)(2)(5 8 6)

To show where i went wrong ill miss out some steps and jum straight to it.

I got 1 -> 3 then 3 -> 7 : so 1->7

I also got 7 -> 4 then 4 -> 1 : so 7->1

when starting off my cycle: 1 goes to 7, then 7 goes to 1...

so my cycle would look like (17...)

but it goes back to 1, does the cycle have to be in one set of brackets?

otherwise I can do it as (17)(...)

thanks!
 
You are right, so p2 * p2 starts with (17)
Then you open a new pair of brackets and start with a number you haven't looked at yet. So take for example 2, then p2 * p2 will become
(17)(2...)
If you complete the cycle while still not having had all the numbers 1 up to 8, open a new bracket again, etc.
 
I now how to write p2 as a product of tranbspositions :P

so (1 3 7 4)(2)(5 8 6)

= (1 3) (3 7) (7 4) ( ? ) (5 8) (8 6)

what goes in the bracket of ( ? ), i believe it needs to have 2 values, so (2 2)?
 
What happens to the 4? What happens to the 6?
2 goes to 2, so it's just (2)
 
Well i have an example in my book, and it says:

( a1, a2, a3, ... , a(k-1), a(k)) = (a1 a2) (a2 a3) (a3 a4) ... (a(k-1) a(k))

Which suggests I would leave the final values inside the bracket alone, as there is no (a(k) a1) term.

And the example I have is:

(2 4 6 7 3)(2 5 1 3)(7 4 8)

= (1 2 5)(3 4 8)(6 7)

= (1 2)(2 5)(3 4)(4 8)(6 7)

Which also leaves out the 5 and 8 (final values of the brackets), is this wrong or?
 
Our Professor had us putting in the last thing as well. I think it's just a difference in the method...My professor wanted it written out like (1 3) (3 7) (7 4) ( 4 1)(2) (5 8) (8 6)(6 5)
I looked in my book and your form of the transpositions isn't in there.

I think you're good.
CC
 
Back
Top