Is P-Polarization Essential for Effective Laser Cutting on Target Surfaces?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Amany Gouda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Laser Laser beam
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

P-polarization significantly enhances laser cutting efficiency on target surfaces due to its electric field orientation, which is parallel to the surface. This orientation minimizes reflection and maximizes ablation, particularly when the laser beam is at oblique angles, approaching the Brewster angle. The discussion confirms that for normal incidence, p- and s-polarizations are degenerate, but as the angle changes, the polarization state becomes crucial for optimizing cutting performance. Key references include the Fresnel equations and studies on laser cutting techniques.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of p-polarization and s-polarization in optics
  • Familiarity with the Fresnel equations
  • Knowledge of Brewster's angle and its implications in laser applications
  • Basic principles of laser ablation and cutting techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Fresnel equations to understand light reflection and transmission at interfaces
  • Study the effects of Brewster's angle on laser cutting efficiency
  • Explore advanced laser cutting techniques and their dependence on polarization
  • Review academic papers on polarization effects in laser ablation experiments
USEFUL FOR

Laser engineers, optical physicists, and professionals involved in laser cutting applications who seek to optimize cutting performance through an understanding of polarization effects.

Amany Gouda
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
if I have laser beam irradiated normally on the target surface and in the same time time it is p- polarized. under these conditions, we will have the electric field which is completely parallel to the target surface and have a great effect on the target surface.
my questions is;
is this statement correct physically. if yes, which law or equation can confirm this statement
 
Science news on Phys.org
Is the electric field not parallel to the target surface for other polarizations?

How do you quantify "great effect"?
 
if you have laser beam with oblique incidence then you will not get electric field parallel to the surface especially in s- polarized beam.
 
Please clarify what you have in mind "normally on the target" and "p-polarized".Polarization state is defined in reference to the laser incident plane, so if your beam falls perpendicularly to the target your polarization state is in degenerate state (p-and s- polarization are the same). Are you performing some ablation/laser cutting experiments?
 
Domullus said:
Please clarify what you have in mind "normally on the target" and "p-polarized".Polarization state is defined in reference to the laser incident plane, so if your beam falls perpendicularly to the target your polarization state is in degenerate state (p-and s- polarization are the same). Are you performing some ablation/laser cutting experiments?
yes, you are true. this is related to ablation experiment. and the choice of the p-polarized is done by my boss and I am try to understand why that happen by adding some physical explanation.
 
Amany Gouda said:
if you have laser beam with oblique incidence then you will not get electric field parallel to the surface especially in s- polarized beam.
The first post was about a normal angle of incidence.

For other angles: yeah, I can imagine that the right polarization maximizes ablation.
 
mfb said:
The first post was about a normal angle of incidence.

For other angles: yeah, I can imagine that the right polarization maximizes ablation.
now I am try to find the required law to ensure the difference between p-polarization and s- polarization for my case
 
I understand your problem. I guess you use polarization perpendicular to laser cutting direction. This is indeed p-polarized beam. Why? Imagine that you move laser beam and ablate a narrow channel. When you translate laser beam second time along this channel, you can distinguish separate polarizations, because your incidence angle is not perpendicular anymore (your reference plane is the walls of the channel). As channel is rather steep, you are close to Brewster angle at this stage, therefore with p-polarized beam you will get lower reflection from the walls. If you use s-polarized light (parallel to cutting direction), greater amount of light will be reflected from the walls. Usually with p-polarized beam you will get more regular cut, but with s- polarized - deeper cut.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb and Amany Gouda
Domullus said:
I understand your problem. I guess you use polarization perpendicular to laser cutting direction. This is indeed p-polarized beam. Why? Imagine that you move laser beam and ablate a narrow channel. When you translate laser beam second time along this channel, you can distinguish separate polarizations, because your incidence angle is not perpendicular anymore (your reference plane is the walls of the channel). As channel is rather steep, you are close to Brewster angle at this stage, therefore with p-polarized beam you will get lower reflection from the walls. If you use s-polarized light (parallel to cutting direction), greater amount of light will be reflected from the walls. Usually with p-polarized beam you get more regular cut, but with s- polarized - deeper cut.
wonderful explanation, is there any official resource (books, articles,..etc) to explain this fact.
 
  • #10
I am not sure. It is rather basic effects and you can refer to any optics textbook (Fresnel equation, Brewster angle, polarization). There are myriads of papers on laser cutting experiments where you can read about polarization effects :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Amany Gouda
  • #11
Domullus said:
I am not sure. It is rather basic effects and you can refer to any optics textbook (Fresnel equation, Brewster angle, polarization). There are myriads of papers on laser cutting experiments where you can read about polarization effects :)
thank you very much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
934
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
870
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K