Pain/Damage - If I dropped an ant

  • Thread starter Thread starter MajorComplex
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effects of free fall on different-sized organisms, specifically comparing humans and ants. It highlights that an ant's surface-to-weight ratio allows it to reach terminal velocity quickly, enabling it to "float" down safely, while larger creatures like elephants face structural challenges due to their size. The square-cube law is referenced, explaining how as size increases, the volume and weight grow faster than the cross-sectional area, impacting the ability to withstand falls. The conversation also touches on the subjective nature of pain and the difficulty in measuring it across species. Ultimately, the larger the organism, the greater the potential damage from a fall, reinforcing the idea that "the bigger they are, the harder they fall."
MajorComplex
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Say we had a six foot wall, I jumped off and measured the pain/damage received because of the fall, how would that differ to an ant if it was dropped from the same height? Because of it's size/weight difference...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How is this question answered by Relativity? I hope you're not using the layman connotation of that term. Forget what Einstein said; Relativity is not about how it feels when you're sitting on a hot stove.
 
Last edited:
Could we tone down the language please Complex? Otherwise your thread is liable to be locked. Gokul was just enquiring why you though relativity should be able to answer you question as opposed to classical physics. I don't think this question is answerable anyway, since pain is subjective; how do you intend to measure the pain experienced by an ant?
 
I didn't ask for his ignorance; simply telling me where it should be would be more helpful than anything...

That's why I put pain/damage... I'm just interested to find out how free fall effects different sized life forms when it hits a surface...

Would it's difference in size/weight effect how damaging the fall would be to it compared to us?
 
Last edited:
MajorComplex said:
I didn't ask for his ignorance
Take it easy with the personal attacks. How am I to know that you didn't have some non-obvious reason for posting this under Relativity? Which is why I asked you.
 
1] An 2mm ant's surface-to-weight ratio is on the order of a million times greater than a human's (1000^2). This means that when ants fall, they reach terminal velocity quickly, and literally float down.
2] An object's ability to withstand crushing is based on its cross-sectional structures (i.e. legs). An ant's cross-sectional area-to-weight ratio is also about a million times greater than a human's. This means it can withstand more weight (proportionally) before collapsing.

Likewise, an elephant's area-to-weight ratio is a few orders of magnitude smaller than a human's. An elephant cannot jump, and if it tried, it would break its legs.

Why? The square-cube law.

Let's leave the elephant alone and instread create a giant that is exactly human-shaped, only 12 feet tall.

Code:
Critter  Height (1D)  leg diam.    X-sectional area of leg (2D)   weight (3D)
Human     6'              5"                5^2 = 25"               200 lbs.
[U]Giant    12'             10"               10^2 = 100"             1600 lbs[/U]
         2x               2x                    4x                    8x
Notet that the legs of the giant are four times as thick in cross-section but they have to support eight times as much weight. They are near the breaking point. A fall from one foot might break a giant's legs.
 
Last edited:
the bigger they are the harder they fall holds true then eh?
 
"I like big fat men like you. When they fall, they make more noise. And sometimes they never get up."

Tuco was right!
 
Back
Top