MHB Parabola standard form of equation at x = -5

Joystar77
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
Find the standard form of the equation of the parabola with the given characteristics and vertex at the origin. Passes through the point (-5, 1/8); vertical axis.

I know that there is no focus of the parabola or equation given for this problem, so how would I solve this problem? Is the correct formula to use the following?:

x^2= 4py

Are these the correct steps to take?

1. Write original equation

2. Divide each side by number given.

3. Write in standard form.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
re: Parabola standard form of equation at x=-5

I have two different formulas for using the conic section of a parabola, can someone please tell me which is correct for this type of problem?

The first one is as follows:
Type: Parabola
General Equation: y = a (x-h)^2 + k
Standard Form: (x - h) ^2 = 4p (y-k)

Notation:
1. x2 term and y1 term.
2. (h,k) is vertex.
3. (h, k does not equal p) is center of focus, where p = 1/4a.
4. y =k does not equal p is directrix equation, where p = 1/4a.

Value:
1. a >0, then opens up.
2. a < 0, then opens down.
3. x = h is equation of line of symmetry.
4. Larger [a] = thinner parabola; smaller [a] = fatter parabola.

Type: Parabola
General Equation: x = a (y-k)^2 + h
Standard Form: (y-k)^2 = 4p(x-h)

Notation:
1. x1 term and y2 term.
2. (h,k) is vertex.
3. (h does not equal p, k) is focus, where p = 1/4a.
4. x = h does not equal p is directrix equation, where p = 1/4a.

Values:

1. a > 0, then opens right.
2. a < 0, then opens left.
3. y = k is equation of line of symmetry.

In this problem, find the standard form of the equation of the parabola with the given characteristics and vertex at the origin. Passes through the point (-5, 1/8); vertical axis. Would this problem be correct if I work it out this way?

The axis is vertical so I know that the vertex is (0,0).

y = a (x - h)^2 + k

Since, I know that the vertex is at (0,0), then I know that h = k = 0 and thought that this would be the proper way to work the problem out.

y = ax ^2

1/8 = 25a

a = 1/200

so, y = 1/200 x ^2

Is this correct way to work out this problem? If not, then can somebody please help me? I am a little confused on which formula to use for this problem.
 
Re: Parabola standard form of equation at x=-5

Personally, I would just look at the fact that the vertex is at the origin, which means, given the vertical axis of symmetry, that the parabola must be of the form:

$$y=ax^2$$

Now, using the other given point, can you determine the value of the parameter $a$?
 
Re: Parabola standard form of equation at x=-5

What do you mean by parameter? Isn't the value of a = 1/200?

MarkFL said:
Personally, I would just look at the fact that the vertex is at the origin, which means, given the vertical axis of symmetry, that the parabola must be of the form:

$$y=ax^2$$

Now, using the other given point, can you determine the value of the parameter $a$?
 
Re: Parabola standard form of equation at x=-5

Joystar1977 said:
What do you mean by parameter? Isn't the value of a = 1/200?

In this context, you can think of a parameter as a constant whose value we must determine. We are told the parabola passes through the point $$(x,y)=\left(-5,\frac{1}{8} \right)$$. And so you are right, we find:

$$\frac{1}{8}=a(-5)^2=25a\implies a=\frac{1}{200}$$

And so we know the parabola satisfying the given conditions is:

$$y=\frac{x^2}{200}$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top