Parallel Axis Theorem | Kinetic and Potential Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angular speed of a rigid body shaped like an "H" when it falls from a horizontal position to a vertical one. The user attempts to apply the parallel axis theorem to find the rotational inertia but expresses uncertainty about the calculations. They initially calculate the total inertia incorrectly and later correct it to include the contributions from each rod. There is confusion regarding the use of symbols for angular speed and the potential energy term in the energy conservation equation. The key takeaway is the need for accurate application of the parallel axis theorem to determine the correct rotational inertia for the system.
Lahooty
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A rigid body is made of three identical rods, each with length L = 0.525 m, fastened together in the form of a letter H, as in Figure 10-56 below. The body is free to rotate about a horizontal axis that runs along the length of one of the legs of the H. The body is allowed to fall from rest from a position in which the plane of the H is horizontal. What is the angular speed of the body when the plane of the H is vertical?

http://www.webassign.net/hrw/10-56.gif

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I_1 = 0

I_2 = m/L∫x^2dx from 0 to L
I_2 = (1/3)*mL^2

I_3 = mL^2

I_total = (4/3)mL^2

E_Mec,Top = E_Mec, Bot

U_T + K_T = U_B + K_B

3*m*g*L + 0 = 0 + (1/2)*Iv^2

3*m*g*L = 1.5*m*L^2*v^2

2*g = L*v^2

[(2*g)/L]^.5 = v

v = 6.11 rad/s

This is wrong I'm pretty sure that I'm calculating the Rotational Inertia incorrectly. I don't know how to use the parallel axis theorem, especially not on three continuous bodies. I know that the formula is:

I = I_com+Mh^2

When I use that to calculate the Inertia, I get:

I_com = 3/2mL^2

I = 3/2mL^2 + 3mL^2
I = 4.5mL^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lahooty said:
U_T + K_T = U_B + K_B

3*m*g*L + 0 = 0 + (1/2)*Iv^2
Why 3mgL? And on the right hand side, the usual symbol for angular speed is \omega, not v, which is usually taken to mean translational speed.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top