Parallel Planes: Same/Opposite Sides of Origin?

PFuser1232
Messages
479
Reaction score
20
According to my book, if we write the equation of a plane as:

##ax + by + cz = d##

And two planes have values of ##d## with the same sign, they are on the same side of the origin. If they have values of ##d## with different signs, they are on opposite sides of the origin.

I'm confused as to whether this applies strictly to two parallel planes, or any pair of planes.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You must decide what "same side of the origin" means for non-parallel planes.
 
  • Like
Likes PFuser1232
jbriggs444 said:
You must decide what "same side of the origin" means for non-parallel planes.

What about parallel planes? If both sides of the plane equation (cartesian form) are multiplied by -1, the position of the plane is unaltered, right?
 
Right. In order to make the "parallel plane" version work, you need for a, b and c to either remain constant or at least to remain proportional and not change signs.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top