Parallel vectors and scalar product rule

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between two vectors, vector a = 2i + 3j and vector b = λi + 12j, with the condition that they are parallel. Participants explore the implications of parallel vectors in terms of angles and the scalar product rule.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the scalar product rule to find the value of λ, expressing concern over a discrepancy in their solution. Other participants suggest checking the working and offer alternative methods for solving the quadratic equation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on checking calculations and simplifying the quadratic equation. There is acknowledgment of different approaches to the problem, including using the property of parallel vectors as multiples of each other.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the original poster's struggle with the quadratic formula and the importance of correctly identifying coefficients in the equation. There is also mention of a test approaching, which adds urgency to the discussion.

pavadrin
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
hey,
ive been given a problem where vector a = 2i + 3j and vector b = \lambdai + 12j and also told that these vectors are parallel of each other. i understand since the vectors are parallel of each other, the angle between them would be equal to zero, thus i could apply the scalar product rule to help solve this problem, which in this case i did.

My working:

<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> {\bf{a}} = 2{\bf{i}} + 3{\bf{j}} \\ <br /> {\bf{b}} = \lambda {\bf{i}} + 12{\bf{j}} \\ <br /> {\bf{a}}\parallel {\bf{b}} \\ <br /> \theta = 0 \\ <br /> \cos \theta = 1 \\ <br /> {\bf{a}} \cdot {\bf{b}} = \left| {\bf{a}} \right|\left| {\bf{b}} \right|\cos \theta \\ <br /> \left( {2{\bf{i}} + 3{\bf{j}}} \right) \cdot \left( {\lambda {\bf{i}} + 12{\bf{j}}} \right) = \left( {\sqrt {13} } \right)\left( {\sqrt {144 + \lambda ^2 } } \right)\left( 1 \right) \\ <br /> 2\lambda + 36 = \left( {\sqrt {13} } \right)\left( {\sqrt {144 + \lambda ^2 } } \right) \\ <br /> \left( {2\lambda + 36} \right)^2 = 13\left( {144 + \lambda ^2 } \right) \\ <br /> 4\lambda ^2 + 144\lambda + 1296 = 1872 + 13\lambda ^2 \\ <br /> - 9\lambda ^2 + 144\lambda - 576 = 0 \\ <br /> x = \frac{{ - b \pm \sqrt {b^2 - 4ac} }}{{2a}} \\ <br /> \lambda = \frac{{ - 144 \pm \sqrt {144^2 - 4\left( { - 9} \right)\left( { - 576} \right)} }}{{2\left( { - 576} \right)}} \\ <br /> \lambda = \frac{1}{8} \\ <br /> \end{array}<br />

this is the wrong answer i know, as the correct answer would result in \lambda being equal to eight, however i do not know how to obtain this answer, any help is greatly appriciated, thanks. sorry for the many post lately but i have a test comeing up which i really wish to do well into prove the teacher that i can do her subject. thanks once again,
Pavadrin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check your working, it should be OK. The second last equation you quoted is right, but you didn't put the numbers in correctly.

Alternately, you can divide your quadratic by -9, then factorise it.
 
okay thanks for your help ill try that right now
 
hey that worked thanks~! i got the answer of 8 and -8. can i ask you why it didn't work when i used the quadratic formula? thanks
 
\lambda = \frac{{ - 144 \pm \sqrt {144^2 - 4\left( { - 9} \right)\left( { - 576} \right)} }}{{2\left( { - 9} \right)}}
One divided by 2c instead of 2a.

As Tomsk suggested, dividing through by -9 would have simplied the solution.

\lambda ^2 - 16\lambda + 64 = 0

Two vectors are parallel if one is a multiple of the other, i.e.

a i + b j = \lambdaa i + \lambdab j
 
Last edited:
oh i see thanks, i feel so stupid now :blushing:
thanks once again,
Pavadrin
 
It would have been a lot simpler to use the fact that parallel vectors are multiples of each other from the start. You have:
2xi + 3xj = yi + 12j
3x = 12
x = 4
2x = y
y = 8
 
okay thanks, i was thinking that perhaps there was an easier way of solving the question but it never quite clicked, thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
46
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
952
Replies
6
Views
3K