Partial Derivative Signs Through Level Curves

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on understanding partial derivatives, specifically the signs of partial derivatives fx and fy through level curves. The participant clarifies that fx is negative at point P, indicating a negative slope in the x-direction. The confusion arises in interpreting the slope with respect to y and the geometric meaning of the second derivative fxx. The participant concludes that fxx relates to the concavity of the function, which is positive in this case.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial derivatives and their geometric interpretations
  • Familiarity with level curves and their significance in multivariable calculus
  • Knowledge of first and second derivatives in calculus
  • Ability to analyze functions graphically, particularly in 2D
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the geometric interpretation of partial derivatives in multivariable calculus
  • Learn about level curves and their applications in understanding function behavior
  • Explore the concept of concavity and its relationship with second derivatives
  • Investigate the implications of negative and positive slopes in the context of optimization problems
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, particularly those focusing on multivariable functions, as well as anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of partial derivatives and their applications in real-world scenarios.

1question
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Question 2 from http://math.berkeley.edu/~mcivor/math53su11/solutions/hw6solution.pdf here.

I do not understand b) and e). How do I think of the slope with respect to y?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I do know that the partial derivatives are the slopes of the tanget lines. I do know that fx < 0 as the slope is negative there (at point P), but I do not understand how the slop in terms of y looks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you say "the slope", it's not clear what you mean because there is a slope in every direction from P for this function. If you did the correct procedure to figure out the sign of fx you should be able to do the exact same thing to figure out fy - why don't you elaborate on how you did fx?
 
Office_Shredder said:
When you say "the slope", it's not clear what you mean because there is a slope in every direction from P for this function. If you did the correct procedure to figure out the sign of fx you should be able to do the exact same thing to figure out fy - why don't you elaborate on how you did fx?

Well, the way I solved for fx was as follows: draw a cross section of the function's 2D hill image (similar to y=1/x). Then place my point p. As the line tangent through P has a negative slope, fx is negative. Actually, I would appreciate help with getting fxx as well - I don't understand how "b/c the x-slope becomes less negative as we move right" correlates with fxx. If fx is the tangent to the curve, then what is fxx geometrically? Answering that would help me a lot.

EDIT: Just googled the second derivative. Now I remember that it tells us the concavity of the quadratic. In this case, is that why fxx is positive? Is that the entire solution to part c) ?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K