Partial derivatives after a transformation

MarkovMarakov
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
Suppose I have a transformation

(x'_1,x'_2)=(f(x_1,x_2), g(x_1,x_2)) and I wish to find \partial x'_1\over \partial x'_2 how do I do it?

If it is difficult to find a general expression for this, what if we suppose f,g are simply linear combinations of x_1,x_2 so something like ax_1+bx_2 where a,b are constants?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MarkovMarakov said:
Suppose I have a transformation

(x'_1,x'_2)=(f(x_1,x_2), g(x_1,x_2)) and I wish to find \partial x'_1\over \partial x'_2 how do I do it?

If it is difficult to find a general expression for this, what if we suppose f,g are simply linear combinations of x_1,x_2 so something like ax_1+bx_2 where a,b are constants?
Let the following transformation rules hold:
x'_1=f(x_1,x_2)
x'_2=g(x_1,x_2)
x_1=F(x'_1,x'_2)
x_2=G(x'_1,x'_2)

Then, we clearly have, for example the identity:
x'_1=f(F(x'_1,x'_2),G(x'_1,x'_2))
Since the pair of marked variables (and the unmarked) are independent from each other, we have the requirement on the functional relationship:
\frac{\partial{x}_{1}^{'}}{\partial{x}_{2}^{'}}=0=\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{x}_{1}}\frac{\partial{F}}{\partial{x}_{2}^{'}}+\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{x}_{2}}\frac{\partial{G}}{\partial{x}_{2}^{'}}
 
Last edited:
Suppose you have, say:
x=u^2-v^2
y=u+v
How can you utilize those implied requirements in the previous post to derive the the correct representations of u and v in terms of x and y?

Note that in this case, it is fairly trivial to find it by algrebrac means; dividing the first relationship by the second, we have x/y=u-v, and thus:
u=1/2(x/y+y), v=1/2(y-x/y)

However, using instead the four identities gained from the above requirements, we have
\frac{\partial{x}}{\partial{x}}=1=2u\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{x}}-2v\frac{\partial{v}}{\partial{x}}
\frac{\partial{x}}{\partial{y}}=0=2u\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{y}}-2v\frac{\partial{v}}{\partial{y}}
\frac{\partial{y}}{\partial{y}}=1=\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{y}}+\frac{\partial{v}}{\partial{y}}
\frac{\partial{y}}{\partial{x}}=0=\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{x}}+\frac{\partial{v}}{\partial{x}}

from these, you should be able to derive the above relations.

Note, for example, that by combining the first and fourth and the known relation y=u+v, you get:
\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{x}}=\frac{1}{2y}
meaning that we must have u(x,y)=x/2y+h(y), where h(y) is some function of y.
Applying the fourth, you get v(x,y)=b(y)-x/2y, for some b(y)

By using known and gained information, you will be able to determine h(y) and b(y) from the second and third relationships.
 
Last edited:
Thank you, arildno.
 
Thread 'Direction Fields and Isoclines'
I sketched the isoclines for $$ m=-1,0,1,2 $$. Since both $$ \frac{dy}{dx} $$ and $$ D_{y} \frac{dy}{dx} $$ are continuous on the square region R defined by $$ -4\leq x \leq 4, -4 \leq y \leq 4 $$ the existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we pick a point in the interior that lies on an isocline there will be a unique differentiable function (solution) passing through that point. I understand that a solution exists but I unsure how to actually sketch it. For example, consider a...
Back
Top