Partial derivatives and thermodynamics

9 replies · 3K views · last reply
voila
Messages
58
Reaction score
6
Hi all.

Suppose I have the ideal gas law $$P=\frac{RT}{v}$$If I'm asked about the partial derivative of P with respect to molar energy ##u##, I may think "derivative of P keeping other quantities (whatever those are) constant", so from the formula above I get $$\frac{\partial P}{\partial u}=0$$However, one of the consequences of the ideal gas law is that energy is only dependent on T as in ##u=cRT##. If I reintroduce this in the ideal gas law, I get $$P=\frac{u}{cv}$$ What if I know want to take the partial derivative of P with respect to u? Then $$\frac{\partial P}{\partial u}=\frac{1}{cv}\neq 0$$which doesn't match the result above.

What am I doing wrong? I've tried to show my general problem using this particular example, but you may guess this kind of confusion causes problems everywhere in thermodynamics.
 
When you write ## P=P(T, V) ##, you can readily take ## (\frac{\partial{P}}{\partial{T}})_V ## and ## (\frac{\partial{P}}{\partial{V}})_T ##, but if you want to find ## (\frac{\partial{P}}{\partial{x}})_y ##, you need to use the chain rule, and also consider both parameters ## T ## , and ## V ## to see if they might have an ## x ## dependence. In full detail (this will take a minute because it's not easy to do in Latex) ## (\frac{\partial{P}(T,V)}{\partial{x}})_y=(\frac{\partial{P}}{\partial{T}})_V (\frac{\partial{T}}{\partial{x}})_y +(\frac{\partial{P}}{\partial{V}})_T (\frac{\partial{V}}{\partial{x}})_y ##. They teach this in detail in an advanced calculus class, but if you study this example, it might help clear up the difficulty. ## \\ ## In your example above, I presume they are writing ## P=P(u, V) ## and finding ## (\frac{\partial{P}}{\partial{u}})_V ##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: voila
Charles Link said:
When you write ## P=P(T, V) ##, you can readily take ## (\frac{\partial{P}}{\partial{T}})_V ## and ## (\frac{\partial{P}}{\partial{V}})_T ##, but if you want to find ## (\frac{\partial{P}}{\partial{x}})_y ##, you need to use the chain rule, and also consider both parameters ## T ## , and ## V ## to see if they might have an ## x ## dependence. In full detail (this will take a minute because it's not easy to do in Latex) ## (\frac{\partial{P}(T,V)}{\partial{x}})_y=(\frac{\partial{P}}{\partial{T}})_V (\frac{\partial{T}}{\partial{x}})_y +(\frac{\partial{P}}{\partial{V}})_T (\frac{\partial{V}}{\partial{x}})_y ##. They teach this in detail in an advanced calculus class, but if you study this example, it might help clear up the difficulty. ## \\ ## In your example above, I presume they are writing ## P=P(u, V) ## and finding ## (\frac{\partial{P}}{\partial{u}})_V ##.

The problem I seem to have is the following. Say I want the variation of P with respect to u keeping the v and T constants. Starting from the ideal gas law: $$\left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial u}\right)_{T,v}=0$$ since T and v re constants.

However, if I start from ##P=\frac{u}{cv}##, I get $$\left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial u}\right)_{T,v}=\frac{1}{cv}\left(\frac{\partial u }{\partial u}\right)_{T,v}=\frac{1}{cv}$$ which is the same I had above.
 
kuruman said:
It looks like you are confusing partial and total derivatives.
It is true that ##\frac{\partial}{\partial u} \left( \frac{RT}{v} \right) =0## and ##\frac{\partial}{\partial u} \left( \frac{u}{cv} \right) =\frac{1}{cv}##
It is also true that ##\frac{dP}{du}=\frac{\partial P}{\partial T}\frac{\partial T}{\partial u}=\frac{1}{cR}\frac{\partial P}{\partial T}=\frac{1}{cR}\frac{R}{v}=\frac{1}{cv}##

Then how is it that ##\left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial u}\right)_{T,v}## can give a different result depending on how I pick it?
 
@voila In the case above, you have two degrees of freedom in this problem. You can write ## P=P(T,V) ## and you can also write ## P(u, V) ##. You cannot take a derivative w.r.t. ## u ## when you are keeping both ## T ## and ## V ## constant. That completely prevents you from varying ## u ##, because ## u=u(T,V) ##.
 
voila said:
Then how is it that ##\left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial u}\right)_{T,v}## can give a different result depending on how I pick it?
Sorry, I deleted my post because you already are in good hands. @Charles Link will see you through.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: voila and Charles Link
Charles Link said:
@voila In the case above, you have two degrees of freedom in this problem. You can write ## P=P(T,V) ## and you can also write ## P(u, V) ##. You cannot take a derivative when you are keeping both ## T ## and ## V ## constant. That completely prevents you from varying ## u ##, because ## u=u(T,V) ##.
I know keeping T, v constants forbid me from changing the energy, but still I applied the definition correctly, right? The thing is, I know you are right: "the variation of pressure with respect to energy, keeping v and T constants" makes no sense because it is physically impossible. However, it kind of seems like an ad hoc argument. Not only that, but what about in other cases where I may be doing something inappropriate like this but not quite as obvious? Seems like I can run into trouble even if I just stick to the definition.
 
@Charles Link Let me ask it to the point: is ##\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial u}\right)_T=0## (assuming ##u=cRT##)??

I think that could kind of make sense, though I had never considered it. Maybe knowing that I may avoid future problems (but I can't promise it!).
 
voila said:
I know keeping T, v constants forbid me from changing the energy, but still I applied the definition correctly, right? The thing is, I know you are right: "the variation of pressure with respect to energy, keeping v and T constants" makes no sense because it is physically impossible. However, it kind of seems like an ad hoc argument. Not only that, but what about in other cases where I may be doing something inappropriate like this but not quite as obvious? Seems like I can run into trouble even if I just stick to the definition.
One suggestion would be to study the application of the partial derivative in post 2 in detail, and I think you will find with practice, that any ambiguities go away. One thing I could add to post 2 is that it is assumed ## x=x(T,V) ## and ## y=y(T,V) ##, ##x ## and ## y ## are alternative parameters that can be used to specify the system, (in this case ## x=u ## and ## y=V ##). If you are taking a course in thermodynamics, you will likely see a lot of these partial derivatives, but once you get some practice with them, they should start to become more commonplace.
 
voila said:
@Charles Link Let me ask it to the point: is ##\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial u}\right)_T=0## (assuming ##u=cRT##)??

I think that could kind of make sense, though I had never considered it. Maybe knowing that I may avoid future problems (but I can't promise it!).
A good puzzle=I don't know that this one has an answer, because the derivative in that form and holding T constant is invalid. I don't know that such an expression could ever arise. ## \\ ## Editing: ## (\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{u}})_V=1 ##, and ## (\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{V}})_u =(\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{V}})_T=0 ##. For the case of ## (\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{u}})_T=(\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{u}})_u ##, I think is an impossible expression that is simply invalid. (Holding ## T ## constant for the case you have is the same as holding ## u ## constant. We have in general ## u=u(T,V) ##, but in this case ## u=cRT ## with no ## V ## dependence.).
 
Last edited: