Partial Differential Equations book for self-study

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around recommendations for self-study resources on partial differential equations (PDEs), particularly for individuals preparing for courses in quantum mechanics and applied PDEs. Participants share their experiences with various textbooks and resources, focusing on their applicability, depth, and style.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to minimize proofs in their study of PDEs, focusing instead on application and problem-solving.
  • Another participant finds the Haberman book decent for learning techniques but criticizes its verbose writing style and frequent use of specific terminology.
  • Suggestions for alternative texts include Strauss's book, which is noted to require more effort, and Farlow's book, which is described as accessible but possibly containing mistakes.
  • A participant mentions a two-volume set by Lyons that emphasizes understanding methods and results over formal proofs, which may appeal to physics students.
  • Stephenson's book is noted for its brevity and straightforward approach, covering fundamentals with few examples.
  • Weinberger's introductory book is recommended for its elementary treatment of heat and wave equations, though it may require more mathematical sophistication than Haberman's text.
  • One participant indicates they have not completed a course in complex analysis, which may limit their ability to engage with some recommended texts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present a variety of opinions on the suitability of different textbooks for self-study, with no consensus on a single best resource. Some express concerns about specific books while others advocate for them, indicating a range of preferences and experiences.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the potential for course materials to change, which may influence their decisions on purchasing textbooks. There are also references to the varying levels of mathematical sophistication required by different texts, which may affect their suitability for beginners.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students preparing for courses in quantum mechanics or applied PDEs, as well as those seeking self-study resources in partial differential equations with a focus on application rather than formal proofs.

rubrix
Messages
136
Reaction score
0
I want to self-study partial differential equations.

i have done some pure math course but I wish to keep proofs to minimal. If possible I don't want to be bothered with PDE proofs in my self study. Instead, I want to learn how to apply and solve PDEs.

the ultimate goal is to prepare myself my quantum mechanics course and Applied PDE course. It seems I'll be doing Applied PDE course after QM.

"Applied Partial Differential Equations by Richard Haberman" is used in PDE course.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0130652431/?tag=pfamazon01-20

any feedback and suggestions will be highly appreciated.

rubrix.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I have used the Haberman book and it's decent... for learning techniques.

His style of writing bugs me to no end though. He uses a lot of words to say very little. Furthermore, there are some paragraphs in which the phrase "(non)-homogeneous linear partial differential equation" appears at least once per sentence, which gets very annoying. He also exclusively uses Leibniz notation. In fact, I think the book would be half its current size if he switched to subscripts to indicate partial derivatives, and started sections with a disclaimer like "in this section we will be discussing (non)-homogeneous linear partial differential equations". These are nit-picky points, obviously. All things considered, it's a decent book.

The book by Strauss is also very good, but requires a lot more work on the part of the reader than does the Haberman book.

Edit: I also suggest looking into the PDE book by Farlow as a sort of prelude to other more comprehensive books. Also the book "An Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of Waves" by Knobel is good, it covers a lot of material but not very deeply, and has accessible sections on interesting things like solitons and shocks which are completely avoided or glossed over in other introductory PDE texts.
 
Last edited:
I'm not going to buy Haberman until few months before i take the course. Who knows they might just change the text for the course or a newer edition of the book might come out. This book is expensive afterall.

I'll skip over Strauss as it does not seem to be suitable for self-study.

I've heard positive things about Farlow's PDE book before. It is also cheap. So can i get more words on it? Is it suitable for first time PDE learner? I hear it has lots of mistakes.

Also what about Applied PDE by Paul DuChateau?

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0486419762/?tag=pfamazon01-20thnx for the info and online resource both of u :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
All You Wanted to Know About Mathematics but Were Afraid to Ask by Lyons is a two-volume set written for physics students. About 3/4 of volume 2 is devoted to PDE stuff. A lot of motivation, examples and intuition is from physics. A lot of emphasis is placed on understanding methods and results, rather than formal proofs. He even has a section on estimating Fourier coefficients simply from the graph of the function!

Partial Differential Equations for Scientists and Engineers by Stephenson is a very short book, which covers the fundamentals of each topic. Few examples and excercises. To-the-point and only 161 pages long. Just an outline. Well written though.
 
For beginning pde Hans Weinberger´s book Int. to PDE, is quite good, because it introduces the usual heat-wave eqns. at a beginner´s level. The text is elementary without being needlessly verbose, and makes use of complex numbers as well as some complex analysis. The mathematical sophistication needed is perhaps more than Haberman, but certainly not that of Evan´s PDE, where you would learn hilbert space methods or and prove difficult inequalities in the exercises.
 
unfortunately, i have not done a course on complex analysis yet.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K