MHB Partial fraction problem (x^2)/[(x-2)(x+3)(x-1)]

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathlearn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fraction Partial
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the partial fraction decomposition of the expression x^2/[(x-2)(x+3)(x-1)]. The method involves breaking the fraction into three components, A, B, and C, and establishing equations based on substituting specific values for x. The Heaviside cover-up method is suggested to find the values of A, B, and C, leading to A = 4/5, B = 9/20, and C = -1/4. Alternative approaches are also mentioned, including setting different values for x to generate a system of equations for A, B, and C. Ultimately, the correct decomposition is confirmed as x^2/[(x-2)(x+3)(x-1)] = 4/5(x-2) + 9/20(x+3) - 1/4(x-1).
mathlearn
Messages
331
Reaction score
0
Hello Everyone , I need some help in solving this partial fraction $\frac{x^2}{(x-2)(x+3)(x-1)}$

I am using this method in which the partial fraction is broken into 3 parts namely A,B &C

$\frac{x^2}{(x-2)(x+3)(x-1)}=\frac{A}{(x-2)}+\frac{B}{(x+3)}+\frac{C}{(x-1)}$

$\frac{x^2}{(x-2)(x+3)(x-1)}=\frac{A(x+3)(x-1)+B(x-2)(x-1)+C(x-2)(x+3)}{(x-2)(x-3)(x-1)}$

Common denominators cancel out resulting in,

${x^2}={A(x+3)(x-1)+B(x-2)(x-1)+C(x-2)(x+3)}$

Now what values should be substituted to $x$ in order to get the relevant values for A,B & C
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, we want:

$$\frac{x^2}{(x-2)(x+3)(x-1)}=\frac{A}{x-2}+\frac{B}{x+3}+\frac{C}{x-1}$$

Now, let's try the Heaviside cover-up method...cover up the factor $(x-2)$ on the LHS, and evaluate what's left for $x=2$ (the root of the factor being covered up...this value will be $A$:

$$A=\frac{2^2}{(2+3)(2-1)}=\frac{4}{5}$$

Likewise, we find:

$$B=\frac{(-3)^2}{((-3)-2)((-3)-1)}=\frac{9}{20}$$

$$C=\frac{1^2}{(1-2)(1+3)}=-\frac{1}{4}$$

Hence:

$$\frac{x^2}{(x-2)(x+3)(x-1)}=\frac{4}{5(x-2)}+\frac{9}{20(x+3)}-\frac{1}{4(x-1)}$$

This is essentially the same as going back to where you left off:

$$x^2=A(x+3)(x-1)+B(x-2)(x-1)+C(x-2)(x+3)$$

Let $x=2$:

$$2^2=A(2+3)(2-1)+B(2-2)(2-1)+C(2-2)(2+3)=5A\implies A=\frac{4}{5}$$

Let $x=-3$:

$$(-3)^2=A((-3)+3)((-3)-1)+B((-3)-2)((-3)-1)+C((-3)-2)((-3)+3)=20B\implies B=\frac{9}{20}$$

Let $x=1$:

$$1^2=A(1+3)(1-1)+B(1-2)(1-1)+C(1-2)(1+3)=-4C\implies C=-\frac{1}{4}$$
 
Thanks Mark, nicely explained
 
mathlearn said:
Hello Everyone , I need some help in solving this partial fraction $\frac{x^2}{(x-2)(x+3)(x-1)}$

I am using this method in which the partial fraction is broken into 3 parts namely A,B &C

$\frac{x^2}{(x-2)(x+3)(x-1)}=\frac{A}{(x-2)}+\frac{B}{(x+3)}+\frac{C}{(x-1)}$

$\frac{x^2}{(x-2)(x+3)(x-1)}=\frac{A(x+3)(x-1)+B(x-2)(x-1)+C(x-2)(x+3)}{(x-2)(x-3)(x-1)}$

Common denominators cancel out resulting in,

${x^2}={A(x+3)(x-1)+B(x-2)(x-1)+C(x-2)(x+3)}$

Now what values should be substituted to $x$ in order to get the relevant values for A,B & C
Are you under the impression that you have to do this is a specific way?

The simplest thing to do is to set x= 1, 2, and -3 so that the factors, x- 1, x- 2, and x+ 3, are 0: That gives three completely separated equations, one for A, another for B, and the last for C.

However, in fact, setting x equal to any three values gives three equations to solve for A, B, and C. For example, setting x= 0 gives $0= -3A+ 2B- 6C$. Setting x= -1 gives $1= -4A+ 6B- 6C$. Setting x= 3, $9= 12A+ 2B+ 6C$. You can solve those three equations for A, B, and C.

Or just multiply the formula on the right:
$x^2= Ax^2+ 2Ax- 3A+ Bx^2- 3Bx+ 2B+ Cx^2+ Cx- 6C= (A+ B+ C)x^2+ (2A- 3B+ C)x+ (3A- 2B+ 6C)$

Then, since these are to be equal for all x, The "corresponding" coefficients" must be equal: $A+ B+ C= 1$, $2A- 3B+ C= 0$, $3A- 2B+ 6C= 0$. Again, three equations to solve for A, B, and C.
 
To find A,multiplying the both sides by (x-2);

x^2/(x+3)(x-1)=A + B(x-2)/(x+3) + C(x-2)/(x-1)

Now,by setting x=2,the expressions containing (x-2) vanish,so we get rid of B & C,

2^2/(2+3)(2-1)=A+0+0, then,

4/5=A

By the similar method we could find B & C.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top