Partial Pressure: Higher SP Determines P

AI Thread Summary
In a vessel containing two substances in both liquid and gas states, the total pressure is influenced by the saturation pressures of each substance. The substance with the higher saturation pressure will not prevent the other from evaporating; instead, both gases will exert their own partial pressures independently. The total pressure is generally the sum of these partial pressures, although some deviations may occur due to interactions between the substances, especially when mixed. If the liquids are mixed, boiling point elevation can lead to a reduction in vapor pressure at a given temperature. The discussion highlights the interplay between chemistry and physics in understanding these pressure dynamics.
Yuri B.
Messages
137
Reaction score
0
Am I assuming right the pressure in a vessel holding two substances (both being in the both liquid and gas states) will be equal to the saturation prerssure of the one which has the higher SP ? That is, for substance A whose SP at a given temp. is 10 B, for instance, and substance B whose SP is 15 B, the partial P will be 15 B?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why would you think that ? That would suggest that the gas with higher saturation pressure somehow prevents the other gas from evaporating, but that is hard to believe.
 
Do you mean it is over 15 B ?
 
My guess would be that the gases will evaporate almost independently, so both gases will have their respective pressure as if they were alone in the vessel. Then total pressure will be the sum of the two partial pressures. However, even approximately true, some deviation from simple sum should be expected, since the two substances influence each other, more in the liquid and at least a little bit in the gas...
 
Jano L. said:
My guess would be that the gases will evaporate almost independently, so both gases will have their respective pressure as if they were alone in the vessel. Then total pressure will be the sum of the two partial pressures.
Yes, those were my thoughts as well.

However, even approximately true, some deviation from simple sum should be expected, since the two substances influence each other, more in the liquid and at least a little bit in the gas...
Hmm, you bring up a good point. If the liquids are not mixed, I expect the total pressure should still be the sum of the two vapor pressures. But if the liquids are mixed, I guess you could get some boiling point elevation, which suggests a lowering of the vapor pressure at a given temperature.

Just an educated guess on my part after reading your post. Somebody with a stronger chemistry background may know better.
 
Redbelly98 said:
Somebody with a stronger chemistry background may know better.
It is not chemistry but rather physics.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top