Particle Accelerator & Energy Consumption

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The energy consumption of particle accelerators varies significantly based on the speed of the particles and the specific design of the accelerator. For example, at Fermilab, stored protons and anti-protons radiate a few milliwatts even at 980 GeV in a 6.28-kilometer circumference orbit, while superconducting magnets experience resistive losses primarily in their connections. The LEP at CERN, with a 26-kilometer circumference, consumed power equivalent to the entire city of Geneva at full energy. The energy usage can be expressed as a percentage relative to the top speed of 2.99999997 m/s.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of particle physics and accelerator technology
  • Knowledge of superconducting magnets and their operational principles
  • Familiarity with energy consumption metrics in high-energy physics
  • Basic principles of cryogenics, particularly liquid helium cooling
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the energy efficiency of superconducting magnets in particle accelerators
  • Explore the cooling requirements for maintaining superconducting magnets at 4 kelvin
  • Investigate the energy consumption of different particle accelerators, including LEP and Fermilab
  • Learn about the production and storage of anti-protons in high-energy physics experiments
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineers, and researchers involved in particle accelerator design and operation, as well as those interested in energy efficiency in high-energy physics applications.

Bjarne
Messages
344
Reaction score
0
How much energy is a accelerator using when keeping particles orbits (by constant speed):

for example:

2.99999997 E8 m/s (or topspeed)
2.98000000 E8 m/s
2.97000000 E8 m/s
2.80000000 E8 m/s

Please mention the energy consumption in % relative to the top-speed (I believe it is - 2.99999997 m/s) or in MW relative to the numbers of particles in orbit.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For stored protons and anti-protons (~1 x 1013 of each) at Fermilab, they radiate a few milliwatts even at 980 GeV in the 6.28 kilometer circumference orbit. The superconducting magnets have resistive losses only in the connections between them (a few nano ohms per connection at 4000 amps). Keeping the magnets at 4 kelvin took lots of liquid helium cooling. Producing anti-protons took a lot more. For electrons, running LEP (the former large electron proton collider at CERN) with a 26 kilometer circumference, at full energy the accelerator used roughly the same amount of power as the entire city of Geneva (I think).
Bob S
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K