Particle Astrophysics: What Is It?

AI Thread Summary
Particle astrophysics merges the fields of particle physics and astrophysics, focusing on how cosmic phenomena can reveal insights about fundamental particles. Researchers in this area often work in physics or astronomy departments, utilizing advanced detectors to study high-energy particles like cosmic rays and neutrinos. The field is rapidly evolving, with ongoing discussions about the nature of dark matter and its implications for particle astrophysics. Many studies involve computational modeling, particularly in theoretical contexts, rather than observational astronomy. Overall, particle astrophysics is characterized by its dynamic nature, adapting to new discoveries and shifting understandings of the universe.
hadsed
Messages
492
Reaction score
2
I posted a topic about this in the academic advisement forum... but it seems that no one really knew the answers (so it died off pretty quick). So I thought I'd ask here, maybe someone will know.

Anyway, what I want to know about is particle astrophysics. From the name, I'd think that it's the merging of particle and astrophysics (two of my favorite areas in physics, which is why I'm interested), but beyond this I don't really know what it means. I was wondering if anyone knew where the majority of particle astrophysicists work (that is, in the particle physics dept., high energy dept., or astrophysics). For example, as I was applying for internships this summer I came across this project that mentioned I'd be creating computational models for dark matter annihilation around black holes. That's the sort of thing that I would be very interested in doing, of course, but if anyone can point me to an exhaustive list (if there exists one, my understanding of the field is that it's rapidly growing but no one really knows what it is yet) or just give any remotely relevant knowledge, that would be great. Since I'm mainly a numerical guy, I'd like to know about some of the areas of particle astrophysics/high energy astrophysics that are being studied numerically. I'm not really very interested in observational astronomy, but I'm a good programmer and I like to work with the math and so theoretical interests me more.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I think it usually refers to the study and the development of apparatus (underground, underwater, surface level, and orbiting detectors) that can detect cosmic rays/high energy particles from outer space, like neutrinos. See: Sudbury Neutrino Observatory.

I recall watching a series of videos on youtube on some high energy detector that picked up a proton form outer space with the kinetic energy of a well-pitched baseball, but I forget what the title was. Everything about it seemed very high-tech.
 
Yes, all I could say is that I believe the core idea about particle astrophysics is basically asking what can we learn about particles by using the universe as our "accelerator", instead of building our own (like CERN). Outside of that basic concept, it's pretty wide open, and each new discovery changes the meaning of the term a little. I'm sure you find people working in it as part of physics departments, who want to know what you can do with particles without joining huge CERN teams, and in astronomy departments, who may be interested in what certain kinds of detectors might discover if aimed at the sky instead of a beam of some kind. You mention dark matter, so that's a classic example of how much in flux a subfield like particle astrophysics might be-- if evidence for what dark matter is comes from space, then particle astrophysics will take on a whole new importance, or if it comes from laboratories, then dark matter will be less of an astroparticle issue. In the mean time, who knows?
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...
Back
Top