Particle in abox : continuous functions problem

g.prabhakar
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I was studying particle in a box from shankar and I couldn't get the following point. If V is infinite at for x > L/2 and x < L/2, so is double derivative of psi. Now Shankar mentions that it follows the derivative of psi has a finite jump. I am not able to get this point because according to my understanding if a function f is such that
f ''(x) = k, a constant, x<=a
f ''(x) = infinite , x>a
then its integration (which comes out to be f '(x) ) from say x=0 to any point x>a (say x=2a) becomes infinite and therefore jump is infinite, (which is contradictory to what shankar mentions)
Where am I going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If V is infinite at for x > L/2 and x < L/2, so is double derivative of psi.
If Shankar said that, then he's the one who is wrong. If V is infinite, then ψ''/ψ is infinite. In other words, ψ is 0 for |x| > L/2.
 
Please correct me if I am wrong but I don't think Shankar is wrong. He is discussing a general case(not specifically particle in a box) where V is infinite for x > L/2. Now time independent schrodinger says
ψ'' = [- 2 m(E-V)/hbar^2)]ψ.
So it is perfectly consistent mathematically that ψ'' is infinite. I couldn't get why ψ'' it can't be infinite? Ofcourse, even ψ can be 0, but the point is how do u decide if either ψ=0 or ψ'' is infinite?
 
g.prabhakar said:
He is discussing a general case(not specifically particle in a box) where V is infinite for x > L/2. Now time independent schrodinger says
ψ'' = [- 2 m(E-V)/hbar^2)]ψ.
So it is perfectly consistent mathematically that ψ'' is infinite. I couldn't get why ψ'' it can't be infinite? Ofcourse, even ψ can be 0, but the point is how do u decide if either ψ=0 or ψ'' is infinite?

Well, "infinite" without further explanation means "undefined".
One needs to be more precise. E.g., you could take V to be a finite constant "C" for
|x| > L/2 and solve the Schroedinger equation for that case, under the conditions
that ψ is suitably continuous everywhere (meaning that ψ and its first derivative
must match at the L/2 boundaries). Then normalize the resulting wavefunction,
and look at what happens as C \to \infty.
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...

Similar threads

Back
Top