Particle Motion with Constant Acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a particle moving in the xy plane with constant acceleration, where its initial and final positions and velocities are provided. The user struggles with calculating the initial velocity and seeks guidance on using kinematic equations. Clarifications are made regarding the nature of constant acceleration and its implications for velocity changes. The conversation highlights the importance of integrating acceleration to derive velocity as a function of time and subsequently position. Ultimately, the user receives advice on how to approach the remaining parts of the problem using integration techniques.
Loppyfoot
Messages
192
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle moves in the xy plane with constant acceleration. At t = 0 the particle is at rvec1 = (3.7 m)i + (3.4 m)j, with velocity vvec1. At t = 3 s, the particle has moved to rvec2 = (9 m)i − (1.9 m)j and its velocity has changed to vvec2 = (5.4 m/s)i − (6.5 m/s)j. (a) Find vvec1.(b) What is the acceleration of the particle?(c) What is the velocity of the particle as a function of time?(d) What is the position vector of the particle as a function of time?

I need some guidance. I tried using the average velocity formula for (a), but it doesn't seem to be working for me. I tried doing 9-3.7 / 3. for the i vector. And likewise, for the j vector (-1.9-3.4)/3. I get 1.76i-1.76j, and it isn't correct.

I need some guidance on the others too. Thanks guys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jeez, I cannot seem to get this! I have been trying to get it all night.
 
Hi Loppyfoot! :smile:

(use bold for vectors :wink:)
Loppyfoot said:
… I tried using the average velocity formula for (a), but it doesn't seem to be working for me.

Distance velocity and acceleration are all vectors, and so they add like vectors.

Try s = vt + (1/2)at2 :wink:
 
How should I implement that equation into part a), if I do not know the acceleration vectors yet?
 
Part of your problem description doesn't make sense to me.
Edit: Now it does make sense.
Loppyfoot said:
A particle moves in the xy plane with constant acceleration. At t = 0 the particle is at rvec1 = (3.7 m)i + (3.4 m)j, with velocity vvec1. At t = 3 s, the particle has moved to rvec2 = (9 m)i − (1.9 m)j and its velocity has changed to vvec2 = (5.4 m/s)i − (6.5 m/s)j.
Edit: Ignore the following.
This description says that the particle moves with constant acceleration. Later it says that the velocity has changed to ... If the acceleration is constant, the velocity can't change, since acceleration is the instantaneous rate of change of velocity with respect to time.
 
Last edited:
If the acceleration is constant, doesn't that mean that the velocity is changing at a constant rate?
 
Never mind. I take back what I said. I was thinking zero acceleration, not constant acceleration.
 
I think I figured it out. I applied one of the 4 kinematic equations, and then I should be able to get the rest from there.

EDIT: I got a and b, but how would I go about getting c and d?
 
For c, if you got b, use it to get the velocity. a = dv/dt, so you can integrate what you have for a to get v as a function of t. You'll get a constant (vector) of integration, but you know v(3), so should be able to figure out the constant.

For d, do essentially the same thing: v = ds/dt. Integrate that to get s and use the given information about s(0) to figure out this constant (vector) of integration. Does that make sense?
 
Back
Top