Particle moving at varying speed along a path

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on traversing an arbitrary path X(u) at a variable speed defined by a sigmoid function σ(t), starting from an initial speed s0 and aiming to reach a maximum speed s1 without exceeding a maximum acceleration A. The user seeks a method to construct the speed function intelligently rather than through trial and error, while ensuring that the speed function's derivative remains symmetrical. Key considerations include the relationship between the path length L and the speed function, as well as the constraints imposed by acceleration limits. Suggestions include formulating equations based on the specified requirements to find a solution. The conversation emphasizes the need for a systematic approach to derive the desired speed function.
jumbo1985
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
Suppose I have a arbitrary path X(u) for u∈[0,1] of length L.

I want to traverse the path at a variable speed (I'm only really concerned about the magnitude of velocity). I want the graph of my speed function σ(t) to have the shape of a sigmoid and I want it to start at an arbitrary value s0 and be bounded by an arbitrary value s1. There's a bound on the maximum magnitude of acceleration equal to A. I want to get to my maximum speed or s1 as fast as possible while not going over the acceleration limit.

From basic calculus and physics I know that:
L = \int_{0}^{t}\sigma(t) dt

I know the value of L. I know that my function will be some form of
\sigma_{1}(t) = 1/(1+e^{-t})
There's a lot that I don't know unfortunately.

Is there a way to build my function σ(t) other than guessing? If not, how to best go about making intelligent guesses so that I eventually converge to my desired function?

Any suggestions welcome. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
s0 and s1 are given, and s1 is the maximum of the sigmoid function?
How much are you allowed to modify this function?

The maximal derivative of the sigmoid function can be calculated, and can be set equal to A. That will always reduce the number of unknowns by one.
 
At u=0, my speed is s_{0} and by the time I get to the end of the curve (u=1), I may be traveling at my maximum speed s_{m} or I may only get up to some speed s_{1} < s_{m}

I suppose this depends on the length of the curve, the maximum speed, the maximum (magnitude of) acceleration, etc.

I'm allowed to modify this curve but I would like to have the (magnitude of) acceleration curve (σ'(t)) be as symmetrical as possible.

Thanks!
 
Well, you can write down the corresponding equations to those requirements, and then see how to solve the equations.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top