Particle Physics: Accuracy of Wikipedia Articles

  • Thread starter Thread starter ScienceNerd36
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wikipedia
AI Thread Summary
Wikipedia is a useful starting point for learning about particle physics, but it should not be relied upon as a sole source of information due to the potential for errors and biases. Users are encouraged to verify information through multiple sources, including textbooks and peer-reviewed journals. While Wikipedia can provide direction and context, the credibility of its citations is crucial; if sources are questionable, the information may be unreliable. Engaging with a variety of resources enhances understanding and confidence in the material.
ScienceNerd36
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
Everything I know about particle physics I've learned from Wikipedia articles. But since anyone can create and edit a wikipedia article, I was wondering how much faith I should put in their information.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ScienceNerd36 said:
Everything I know about particle physics I've learned from Wikipedia articles. But since anyone can create and edit a wikipedia article, I was wondering how much faith I should put in their information.

It's a good resourse to have, but you can't rely on it. For that matter, you can't rely on books or teachers either. All of these sources are prone to error. Sometimes you have to think and do research to dig out the answers for yourself. I've found many errors on Wikipedia. Some are typos, some are just misinformation from unqualified individuals and some are one viewpoint on a debatable issue.

Seek out information from many sources both historical and current. The good thing about this type of forum is that a question presented here is going to give you a wide range of answers to guide you and give you confidence about any information you obtain.
 
Elaborating on what elect_eng said, Wikipedia is in many cases a great starting point for topics. If you want to really learn something, you're going to need a legitimate textbook and the brainpower to work through and understand it rather than just mindlessly absorb.
 
Elaborating on what Nabeshin said, wikipedia articles are going to point you in the right direction for the most part. The most important thing is, however, the citations at the bottom of a page. If a section in an article references to www.my_crazy_theory.com[/URL], you probably should be worried. My advice to people, at least when writing reports, is if you're going to use wikipedia, just go to the website/journal/article that is cited for the information you need and use it instead.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks, you've been a lot of help.
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top