B Particle properties conclusion from no-slit diffraction

roineust
Messages
341
Reaction score
9
Is it possible to infer particle properties from 2 sources diffraction with no slit/slits involved?

Some explanations of experiments i can find, if i understand them correctly at all, relate to the possibility of concluding particle momentum, from absorption lines, when emanating from a single source, passing though a slit or slits. But is it possible to infer particle properties such as momentum, from diffraction patterns emanating from 2 sources, with no slit or slits which the particle/wave passes though?

Am i making any sense with this question or have i just made a huge mess of quantum mechanics basics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In general, I don't think you can do much with just two photons, at least not much more than you can with a single photon.
It may be of interest to look at two r-f (radio frequency) (antenna) sources: Yes, they do make an interference pattern and there are no slits involved.
 
  • Like
Likes roineust
But can any particle properties be inferred from no-slit interference pattern, the same way that, if i understand correctly, particle properties are inferred from slit experiments absorption lines and granularity?
 
I forgot to mention that the two r-f sources need to be in phase or have a constant relative phase. Otherwise, you do not get a well-ordered interference pattern. Two individual photons will not give a regular interference pattern.
They have actually done experiments with single photons using a beamsplitter and mirrors=Michelson interferometer. If I remember correctly, the result was a single photon can produce an interference pattern, i.e. If there are numerous single photon events, you do get an interference pattern.
 
Last edited:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top