Understanding Particle Self-Interference in the Double Slit Experiment

blokeice
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I was wondering to what extent we understand the self interference of particles in the double slit experiment. More specifically, I have heard that a single particle, acting as a wave can pass through both slits at once and that is what causes the interference. This explanation seems a bit fishy to me since it seems that if you just had two slits separated on the other side by a metal sheet you could split an electron or even a buckyball into two waves which should be impossible. What is actually known about what is going on with PSI?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can diffract a buckyball!

http://www.univie.ac.at/qfp/research/matterwave/c60/index.html
 
If you fire an electron at double slits which are separated on the back side, splitting in half is exactly what WILL happen to its wavefunction. However, when you go to actually measure which side the electron went to, you will find that it resides entirely in one or the other, with a 50/50 chance of being in each. It's the probability for the electron's position that splits in half, not its actual position.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top