Particle symmetries and unification

friend
Messages
1,448
Reaction score
9
I'm given to understand that the internal symmetries of particle physics, U(1)SU(2)SU(3), does not depend on the dimensionality or curvature of the background spacetime. If the present particle symmetry is internal, than how can there be a unification of the forces that make the forces indistinguishable when the particle symmetries themselves continue to be distinctly U(1)SU(2)SU(3)? I wouldn't think that U(1)SU(2)SU(3) depends on energy since that is just motion through space which it does not depend on. Any help is appreciated. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
friend said:
I'm given to understand that the internal symmetries of particle physics, U(1)SU(2)SU(3), does not depend on the dimensionality or curvature of the background spacetime. If the present particle symmetry is internal, than how can there be a unification of the forces that make the forces indistinguishable when the particle symmetries themselves continue to be distinctly U(1)SU(2)SU(3)? I wouldn't think that U(1)SU(2)SU(3) depends on energy since that is just motion through space which it does not depend on. Any help is appreciated. Thanks.

I did find this website that seems to explain a lot:

http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/research/gr/public/cs_phase.html

So the question is if phase transitions, falling of the false vacuum, and symmetry breaking are all referring to the same thing. Or maybe they all happen at the same time.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...

Similar threads

Back
Top