Particles having nonzero rest mass can approach the speed of light

Pabs
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Particles having nonzero rest mass can approach, but not reach, the speed of light, since their mass would become infinite at that speed.

Can anyone expound upon this commencing with the very fundamental concepts (nonzero rest mass, mass, inertia, infinite mass etc.)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Modern physicists would say that the particle's mass is always the same, and that it is its energy which becomes infinite at the speed of light.

Because energy and mass are quite directly related, however, a particle with more energy behaves, in the framework of Newton's laws, as if it had more mass.

Newton's laws are not correct except at low relative velocities, however -- so rather than modifying them by assuming an "increased mass," it makes more sense to simply not use them at high relative velocities. They are replaced by relativistic mechanics.

Nowadays, when someone says "mass," they mean "rest mass" or "invariant mass," which is a fundamental and unchanging characteristic of the object under scrutiny.

- Warren
 
Why would the mass of a particle become infinite at the speed of light? That was the essential intention of my questions.
 
No, the mass will always be the same. If the mass is non-zero, however, the energy will be infinite at the speed of light. (Kinetic energy depends on mass.)

- Warren
 
Originally posted by chroot
Modern physicists would say that the particle's mass is always the same, and that it is its energy which becomes infinite at the speed of light. ... Newton's laws are not correct except at low relative velocities, however -- so rather than modifying them by assuming an "increased mass," it makes more sense to simply not use them at high relative velocities. They are replaced by relativistic mechanics.

Nowadays, when someone says "mass," they mean "rest mass" or "invariant mass," which is a fundamental and unchanging characteristic of the object under scrutiny.

- Warren

I agree, but with the exception that energy isn't divergent for massless particles which I'm sure you know and I would be careful about the following:

Because energy and mass are quite directly related, however, a particle with more energy behaves, in the framework of Newton's laws, as if it had more mass.

As mentioned in another thread the four vector law of motion for special relativity is four vector force equals mass times four vector acceleration
F^\mu = mA^\mu
where the mass m does not change with speed. The relation "in the framework of Newton's laws" that you are probably considering is the relation between ordinary force and coordinate acceleration. In that case the relativistic behavior can not be described simply by replacing mass with relativistic mass in
f = ma
either. To speed up a particle most effectively you want all the force in the direction of motion and when you do that the relation will be two orders of \gamma too big to be relativistic mass.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top