Particles having nonzero rest mass can approach the speed of light

Pabs
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Particles having nonzero rest mass can approach, but not reach, the speed of light, since their mass would become infinite at that speed.

Can anyone expound upon this commencing with the very fundamental concepts (nonzero rest mass, mass, inertia, infinite mass etc.)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Modern physicists would say that the particle's mass is always the same, and that it is its energy which becomes infinite at the speed of light.

Because energy and mass are quite directly related, however, a particle with more energy behaves, in the framework of Newton's laws, as if it had more mass.

Newton's laws are not correct except at low relative velocities, however -- so rather than modifying them by assuming an "increased mass," it makes more sense to simply not use them at high relative velocities. They are replaced by relativistic mechanics.

Nowadays, when someone says "mass," they mean "rest mass" or "invariant mass," which is a fundamental and unchanging characteristic of the object under scrutiny.

- Warren
 
Why would the mass of a particle become infinite at the speed of light? That was the essential intention of my questions.
 
No, the mass will always be the same. If the mass is non-zero, however, the energy will be infinite at the speed of light. (Kinetic energy depends on mass.)

- Warren
 
Originally posted by chroot
Modern physicists would say that the particle's mass is always the same, and that it is its energy which becomes infinite at the speed of light. ... Newton's laws are not correct except at low relative velocities, however -- so rather than modifying them by assuming an "increased mass," it makes more sense to simply not use them at high relative velocities. They are replaced by relativistic mechanics.

Nowadays, when someone says "mass," they mean "rest mass" or "invariant mass," which is a fundamental and unchanging characteristic of the object under scrutiny.

- Warren

I agree, but with the exception that energy isn't divergent for massless particles which I'm sure you know and I would be careful about the following:

Because energy and mass are quite directly related, however, a particle with more energy behaves, in the framework of Newton's laws, as if it had more mass.

As mentioned in another thread the four vector law of motion for special relativity is four vector force equals mass times four vector acceleration
F^\mu = mA^\mu
where the mass m does not change with speed. The relation "in the framework of Newton's laws" that you are probably considering is the relation between ordinary force and coordinate acceleration. In that case the relativistic behavior can not be described simply by replacing mass with relativistic mass in
f = ma
either. To speed up a particle most effectively you want all the force in the direction of motion and when you do that the relation will be two orders of \gamma too big to be relativistic mass.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top