Particles Overview: Learn About Subatomic Particles

  • Thread starter Thread starter Starproj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particles
Starproj
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am in emergency mode! I am enrolled in a 400 level modern physics course, that I thought would be a continuation of the 200-level modern physics required as a sophomore. The prof expects us to be familiar with subatomic particles -- all of them. So far in my education I have only been exposed to bosons and fermions and their constituents. I have tried to do a Google search to find a table that summarizes and catalogs these particles, similar to the periodic table, but the sites I have found, to be honest, are more than I am looking for at this point. Does anyone have or know of a handle at-a-glance table I can use to start memorizing them this weekend? I know this sounds desperate, and I apologize, but I am in dire need.

As always, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're probably going to need to be more specific. If you're looking for a list of all the fundamental particles that we know of (i.e., leptons, quarks, and gauge bosons), that can be found on the Wikipedia page for the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model" . Or by subatomic particles do you just mean electrons, protons, and neutrons?

A list of all measured (fundamental as well as composite) particles can be found on the http://pdg.lbl.gov/" website. Good luck memorizing all of those. I'm not aware of a condensed table form of those.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Another good one IMO is: http://www.cpepweb.org/cpep_sm_large.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you for pointing me in the right direction. By following your links and doing a little elbow grease, I have been able to generate an outline of what's what and in what group.

I should have been an English major...
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top