Pascal grade 9 math contest question(can you ratio speed and time)

AI Thread Summary
Cindy's cycling speeds and arrival times create a problem involving distance, speed, and time. The initial attempt to use a speed-to-time ratio was flawed, as it did not account for the total distance traveled. The correct approach involves setting up equations based on the relationship between distance, speed, and time. By solving these equations, the correct speed for Cindy to arrive home at 5:00 PM is determined to be 12 km/h. Understanding the proper use of these relationships is crucial for solving similar problems.
kevinshen18
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I was given this question from the Pascal Math contest 2001:

__________________________________________
Cindy leaves school at the same time every day. If she cycles at 20 km/h, she arrives home at 4:30 in the afternoon. If she cycles at 10 km/h, she arrives home at 5:15 in the afternoon. At what speed, in km/h, must she cycle to arrive home at 5:00 in the afternoon?
__________________________________________

This was how I attempted to solve it:

A difference in 10km/h (20km/h - 10km/h) results in her being 45 minutes late(5:15 - 4:30).
So I ratio it:
\frac{10km/h}{45min} = \frac{Xkm/h}{30min}

If a difference of 10km/h results in a 45 minutes delay then what's the speed difference(X) that results in a 30 minutes delay(5:00 - 4:30).

I cross multiplied and got x = 6.6666...km/h.
Subtracting that from 20km/h my answer was 13.3333...km/h

The correct answer was 12 km/h.

Now I have no idea how I got it wrong but I would assume that the mistake was the speed to time ratio. Is it correct to do that? Can you even ratio speed and time or is that incorrect and not allowed? If it's not possible then why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to find the total time it took her to get home, not just the additional time after the 20km/h trip.

Edit: Here are some additional hints of how to set it up correctly.
Distance = velocity x time.
In this case, because Distance1 = Distance2 = Distance3 = Distance,
Distance = Velocity1*Time1 = Velocity2*Time2 = Velocity3*Time3
Time1: Unknown
Time2: Time1 + 45 minutes
Time3: Time1 + 30 minutes.

You'll have to evaluate Time1 before you can solve this.
 
Last edited:
I see. Thank you!
So if total time was given that I could ratio?
 
kevinshen18 said:
I was given this question from the Pascal Math contest 2001:

__________________________________________
Cindy leaves school at the same time every day. If she cycles at 20 km/h, she arrives home at 4:30 in the afternoon. If she cycles at 10 km/h, she arrives home at 5:15 in the afternoon. At what speed, in km/h, must she cycle to arrive home at 5:00 in the afternoon?
__________________________________________

This was how I attempted to solve it:

A difference in 10km/h (20km/h - 10km/h) results in her being 45 minutes late(5:15 - 4:30).
So I ratio it:
\frac{10km/h}{45min} = \frac{Xkm/h}{30min}

If a difference of 10km/h results in a 45 minutes delay then what's the speed difference(X) that results in a 30 minutes delay(5:00 - 4:30).

I cross multiplied and got x = 6.6666...km/h.
Subtracting that from 20km/h my answer was 13.3333...km/h

The correct answer was 12 km/h.

Now I have no idea how I got it wrong but I would assume that the mistake was the speed to time ratio. Is it correct to do that? Can you even ratio speed and time or is that incorrect and not allowed? If it's not possible then why?

Set up two equations for T = starting time (hrs) and X = distance traveled (km). Remember,
time traveled = distance/speed, so
(1) 4.5 - T = X/20
(2) 5.25 - T = X/10
Solve these two equations to get T and X.

Now you need to find v that gives 5-T = X/v, where T and X are known at this point.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
kevinshen18 said:
I see. Thank you!
So if total time was given that I could ratio?

Sort of. Your ratio would be Velocity1/Time2 = Velocity2/Time1, but it's easier to leave it as Velocity1*Time1 = Velocity2*Time2.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
jz92wjaz said:
Sort of. Your ratio would be Velocity1/Time2 = Velocity2/Time1, but it's easier to leave it as Velocity1*Time1 = Velocity2*Time2.

Yea I agree, I'll just solve it with your method then.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top