How does Pascal triangle apply to (a+b+c)^n and (a+b+c+...+d)^n?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pascal Triangle
AI Thread Summary
Pascal's triangle is primarily used for binomial coefficients in the expansion of (a+b)^n, but for expressions involving more than two variables, such as (a+b+c)^n or (a+b+c+...+d)^n, multinomial coefficients are required. The multinomial coefficient for m variables raised to the power n is expressed as (i+j+...+k)!/(i! j!...k!). This formula accounts for the different arrangements of the variables in the expansion. Thus, while Pascal's triangle is useful for binomials, multinomial coefficients are necessary for handling multiple variables in polynomial expansions. Understanding this distinction is essential for solving equations involving multiple terms raised to a power.
MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
does pascal triangle use in this equation (a+b+c)^n i know it is used in (a+b)^n?

and how could you solve for m number of numbers to the power n?
(a+b+c+...+d)^n
||
\/
m numbers.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
No, Pascal's triangle give binomial coefficients.

What you need are "multinomial" coefficients.

The binomial coefficients are given by nCm= n!/(m!(n-m)!) because there are that many ways of arranging m x's and n-m y's to give the product xmyn-m.

The "trinomial" coefficient for xiyjzk would be (i+j+k)!/(i! j! k!)

If you have "m" numbers to the "n" power: (x1+ x2+...+xm)n then the "multi-nomial" coefficient for x1ixjj...xmk would be

(i+ j+ ...+ k)!/(i! j! ... k!).
 
thanks :smile:
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top