Passive and Active Low Pass Filters

  • Thread starter Thread starter jendrix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Filter Filters
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the comparison between passive and active low pass filters, exploring their advantages and disadvantages, particularly in the context of low-frequency applications. Participants examine the implications of using reactive components versus resistive-capacitive (RC) designs, as well as the potential for simulating inductors in electronic circuits.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that reactive filters are preferable at lower frequencies due to the size of inductors required for low cutoff points.
  • Others propose that RC circuits could be a viable alternative, noting the small physical size of capacitors in the range of 4uF when paired with a 470Ω resistor.
  • It is noted that passive filters, which do not include amplifiers, may have inherent losses in the passband due to resistance, while LC filters can provide sharper cutoffs.
  • Some participants highlight that active filters, which incorporate op-amps, can isolate loads from frequency-setting components, allowing for more predictable responses when connecting multiple filters.
  • A suggestion is made that a transistor and additional components can simulate a large inductor, referencing the concept of a gyrator.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness and practicality of passive versus active filters, with no consensus reached on which is superior for low-frequency applications. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to filter design.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various configurations and components, but the discussion does not resolve the implications of different load conditions on passive filters or the specific design requirements for multi-stage filters.

jendrix
Messages
120
Reaction score
4
Hello,

I have been doing some research into the above filters and ran into a question. I saw a video that covered the pros and cons of each type of filter and it was recommended that a reactive filter was used at lower frequencies, the reason given was that the inductor that would be required for a low cutoff point (sub 100Hz) would be physically large.

My question was, couldn't this be remedied by using an RC design circuit instead? And even if you increased the order you could still only use resistors and capacitors.

So this would leave a capacitor in the 4uF range assuming a resistor of 470Ω were to be used, these are physically small if they are required to be.

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
jendrix said:
Hello,

I have been doing some research into the above filters and ran into a question. I saw a video that covered the pros and cons of each type of filter and it was recommended that a reactive filter was used at lower frequencies, the reason given was that the inductor that would be required for a low cutoff point (sub 100Hz) would be physically large.

My question was, couldn't this be remedied by using an RC design circuit instead? And even if you increased the order you could still only use resistors and capacitors.

So this would leave a capacitor in the 4uF range assuming a resistor of 470Ω were to be used, these are physically small if they are required to be.

Thanks
By "passive" I presume you mean not active ie no amplifier.
By reactive I presume you mean containing only L and C.
An LC filter is able to provide sharper cut off and smaller losses in the passband. For the RC filter, the resistance is always there, and under matched conditions will create attenuation in the passband.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave
tech99 said:
By "passive" I presume you mean not active ie no amplifier.
By reactive I presume you mean containing only L and C.
An LC filter is able to provide sharper cut off and smaller losses in the passband. For the RC filter, the resistance is always there, and under matched conditions will create attenuation in the passband.

Thanks you, so there are advantages to both and it is about choosing the right configuration depending on the end goal? From what I have read, an active filter seems to be favoured for lower frequencies, with the RC in conjunction with an op-amp.

To clarify, I meant 'active' as in containing a combination of RLC along with an op-amp

And 'passive' to mean only using a combination of RL or C components.
Regards
 
Active filters almost always incorporate the OP-AMP in such a way that it isolates the anticipated loads from the frequency-setting components, so that the load can be changed without affecting the filter's characteristics. This means you can connect a low pass filter so it follows a high pass filter to give a bandpass response which is readily predictable.

Where the filter is restricted to all passive components, then the load becomes part of the filter design, and any change in the load is reflected as a change in the filter's response. This means it is, in general, not possible to connect multiple passive filters sequentially to produce a multi-stage filter having a response predicted by the filter responses of its individual stages. A multi-stage (higher order) passive filter must be designed in its entireity, and include the known impedances of the fixed source and the fixed load.
 
jendrix said:
I have been doing some research into the above filters and ran into a question. I saw a video that covered the pros and cons of each type of filter and it was recommended that a reactive filter was used at lower frequencies, the reason given was that the inductor that would be required for a low cutoff point (sub 100Hz) would be physically large.
Yes, but with a little bit of electronics, you can simulate a large inductor using a transistor and some resistors and capacitors (Google "Gyrator").
 
A good reference with active filter circuits can be downloaded here: https://archive.org/download/NationalSemiconductorLinearApplicationsHandbook1994/NationalSemiconductorLinearApplicationsHandbook1994.pdf
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K