Patches and Surfaces (Differential Geometry)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of patches in differential geometry, specifically evaluating the mapping x: R² to R³ defined by x(u,v) = (u, uv, v). For a mapping to qualify as a patch, it must be both injective and regular. The user successfully demonstrated that the mapping is regular but seeks clarification on proving its injectivity. The hint provided in the textbook suggests that proving x(u,v) = x(u₁,v₁) leads to (u,v) = (u₁,v₁) is the correct approach to establish injectivity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential geometry concepts, particularly patches.
  • Familiarity with mappings and their properties, including injectivity and regularity.
  • Knowledge of directional derivatives and their application in proving smoothness.
  • Experience with mathematical proofs and logic.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of injective mappings in greater detail.
  • Learn about regularity conditions in differential geometry.
  • Explore additional resources on differential geometry, such as "Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces" by Manfredo P. do Carmo.
  • Practice problems involving patches and mappings to solidify understanding.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying differential geometry, as well as anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of patches and mappings in higher dimensions.

i1100
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm completely confused with patches, which were introduced to us very briefly (we were just given pictures in class). I am using the textbook Elementary Differential Geometry by O'Neill which I can't read for the life of me. I'm here with a simple question and a somewhat harder one.

Homework Statement


Is the following mapping x:R^2 to R^3 a patch?

x(u,v)=(u, uv, v)?


Homework Equations



For a mapping to be a patch, it must be one-to-one (injective) and regular (smooth).

The Attempt at a Solution



I understand how to show that it is regular; for any arbitrary direction, either the directional derivative of the x component or the directional derivative of the y component is non-zero. Now, I don't know how to prove that it is injective. The book gives a hint: x is one-to-one iff x(u,v) = x(u_1, v_1) implies (u,v)=(u_1,v_1).

So my attempt was to just let x(u_1,v_1) = (u_1, u_1v_1, v_1) so that
(u_1, u_1v_1, v_1)=(u, uv, v). Is this the correct way of going about it? I feel like I didn't show anything.

Can someone also point me toward a better book or online notes where I can try to understand some of this material?

Thank you, any help or suggestions will be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose that x(u,v)=x(w,z). Then (u,uv,v)=(w,wz,z), and this implies (u,v)=(w,z).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K