Pauli-Lubanski pseudovector commutation relations

Factvince
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi. This is not a homework question per se, but more of a personal question, but I thought I'd post it here.
I'm trying to prove the commutation relations of the Pauli-Lubanski pseudovector
\begin{equation}
W_\mu\equiv-\frac{1}{2} \epsilon_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}J^{\nu\rho}P^\sigma
\end{equation}
with the Lorentz transformation generators \begin{equation}J^{\mu\nu}.\end{equation}

I'm supposed to find
\begin{equation}
\left[J_{\mu\nu},W_\rho\right]= \mathrm{i}\left( \eta_{\nu\rho}W_\mu-\eta_{\mu\rho}W_\nu\right)
\end{equation}

but I simply can't.

Homework Equations


Obviously I have to use
\begin{align}
\left[P_\mu,P_\nu\right]&= 0,\\
\left[P_\mu,J_{\nu\rho}\right]&= \mathrm{i}\left(\eta_{\mu\rho}P_\nu-\eta_{\mu\nu}P_\rho\right),\\
\left[J_{\mu\nu},J_{\rho\sigma}\right]&= \mathrm{i}\left(\eta_{\mu\rho}J_{\sigma\nu}- \eta_{\nu\rho}J_{\sigma\mu}- \eta_{\mu\sigma}J_{\rho\nu}+ \eta_{\nu\sigma}J_{\rho\mu}\right)
\end{align}

The Attempt at a Solution



My calculations gave
\begin{equation}
\left[J_{\kappa\lambda},W_\mu\right]= -i\left(\eta_{\tau\lambda} \epsilon_{\kappa\rho\mu\sigma} J^{\rho\tau}P^\sigma- \frac{1}{2} \eta_{\tau\lambda} \epsilon_{\kappa\rho\mu\sigma} J ^{\sigma\rho}P^\tau- \eta_{\tau\kappa} \epsilon_{\lambda\rho\mu\sigma} J^{\rho\tau}P^\sigma+ \frac{1}{2}\eta_{\tau\kappa} \epsilon_{\lambda\rho\mu\sigma} J^{\sigma\rho}P^\tau\right).
\end{equation}
I'm pretty confident this is correct, but in the meantime I don't see where to go when I get here.

Any help very much appreciated !
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Factvince! Welcome to PF! :wink:

You can restore that missing equation by pressing the "EDIT" button and typing a space at least every 50 characters (it's a PF bug). :smile:
 
Thanks very much tiny-tim !
 
I went a little further and I can sense I could do something with antisymmetry arguments here :

\begin{align*}
\left[W_\mu,J_{\kappa\lambda}\right]&= \frac{\mathrm{i}}{2}\left\{\eta_{\tau\lambda}\left( \epsilon_{\mu\kappa\rho\sigma} J^{\rho\tau}P^\sigma+ \epsilon_{\mu\sigma\kappa\rho} J^{\tau\sigma}P^\rho+ \epsilon_{\mu\rho\kappa\sigma} J^{\sigma\rho}P^\tau\right)\right\}\\
&- \frac{\mathrm{i}}{2}\left\{\eta_{\tau\kappa}\left( \epsilon_{\mu\lambda\rho\sigma} J^{\rho\tau}P^\sigma+ \epsilon_{\mu\sigma\lambda\rho}J ^{\tau\sigma}P^\rho+ \epsilon_{\mu\rho\lambda\sigma}J ^{\sigma\rho}P^\tau\right)\right\}.
\end{align*}

Being able to "switch" \mu and \tau would solve the problem, but I don't see any good way to justify such a move here.
 
Some Fierz reshuffling of indices seems to be useful.

I found for myself the following identity (not confirmed!):

\epsilon_{\kappa\lambda\mu\nu}g_{\sigma\tau}<br /> -\epsilon_{\kappa\lambda\tau\nu}g_{\sigma\mu}=<br /> \epsilon_{\mu\tau\lambda\nu}g_{\sigma\kappa}<br /> -\epsilon_{\mu\tau\kappa\nu}g_{\sigma\lambda}

This formula makes possible the exchange of the antisymmetric pair κλ with μτ.
(I know that the ordering of the indices in my formula is not perfect.)

For disentangling all those indices in the actual problem, I tried to use the pictorial notation of Penrose. But I didn't come to a solution either... :-/
 
My teacher gave me the answer months ago and I forgot about this thread: since Minkwoski space is four-dimensional, any expression which is antisymmetrised over five indices is identically zero. So one can write
\begin{equation}
\eta_{\tau\lambda}\epsilon_{\mu\varkappa\rho\sigma} + \eta_{\mu\lambda}\epsilon_{\varkappa\rho\sigma\tau} + \eta_{\varkappa\lambda}\epsilon_{\rho\sigma\tau\mu} + \eta_{\rho\lambda}\epsilon_{\sigma\tau\mu\varkappa} + \eta_{\sigma\lambda}\epsilon_{\tau\mu\varkappa\rho} = 0
\end{equation}
and that pretty much wraps it up. By the way, there were a couple of mistakes in the last result I gave due to the fact that I had the wrong sign for the
\begin{equation}
\left[P_\mu,J_{\nu\rho}\right]
\end{equation}
commutator.
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top