Pauli Matrices as generators of SU(2)

OSUPhysics
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Why is it that the Pauli spin matrices ( the operators of quantum spin in x,y,z) are the generators of a representation of SU(2)? I understand that we use the 2X2 representation as it is the simplest, but why is it that spin obeys this SU(2) symmetry and how is it that we come up with the Pauli matrices for the spin operators?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SU(2) is isomorphic to Spin(3), which is the double cover of the rotation group in three dimensions. That is, its Lie algebra is identical to the rotation group, but the map between the groups themselves is 2-to-1.

The real group of interest here is Spin(3), which is constructed via Clifford algebra. In this case, it happens to be equivalent to SU(2).

Deriving the Pauli matrices from scratch involves some slightly more advanced ideas that maybe someone else has more time to relate.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top