B Peeking at the answer of an unsolved problem.

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter CynicusRex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cheating
AI Thread Summary
Peeking at the answer to an unsolved problem can be beneficial if done sparingly, especially during self-study. It allows learners to overcome cognitive blocks and gain insights into different problem-solving approaches. However, it's important to ensure that most problems are attempted independently before resorting to solutions. Keeping a list of problems that required peeking can help reinforce learning by revisiting them later. Ultimately, the goal is to develop the ability to solve problems without assistance, which enhances understanding and retention.
CynicusRex
Gold Member
Messages
98
Reaction score
68
Should peeking at the answer of an unsolved problem be avoided at any cost?
I'm self studying at the moment and have a document with the solutions. It doesn't happen frequently, but I have had to peek at answers a couple of times. I really hate doing it though.
Thoughts?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You are self studying. This is allowed but be aware that the solution sheet answer may not be right.

Schaums Outlines are based on this predicate. They provide complete solutions for you to follow and then later problems provide only final answers with no step by step.

One thing you could do is make a list of the ones you had to peek at and go back later and try to solve them again from scratch. Also try to develop useful check strategies.

As an example, a problem asks you to identify two vectors and from them create a third which is perpendicular to both. The check would be to test that your computed vector hen dotted with the first two is indeed perpendicular to them.

Eventually you won't need to peek which becomes really useful when you start solving original problems that no one has solved.
 
  • Like
Likes CynicusRex
Hmm, making a list of the cheated ones is a good idea. And indeed, I have come across at least one mistake before.
 
There's nothing wrong with looking at the answers as long as you are still solving most of the problems yourself before looking. It can save you wasting weeks trying to solve a single problem on which you have a simple cognitive or memory block.

Looking at the answer to a problem that has blocked you, after you've made a worthwhile effort, is a good way to learn, because the effort will have awoken you to various different possible avenues to a solution, and you're more likely to remember the path used - and befeit from it in future problems - if you've already tried several and it's different from all of them.
 
  • Like
Likes CynicusRex
Just make sure after peeking that you can solve without peeking, possibly during a separate study session later on, next day, before test, etc.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top