Pendulum - How it affects gear train torque?

AI Thread Summary
Lengthening the pendulum in a weight-driven clock does not change the torque applied by the gear train or escapement to the pendulum. The pendulum acts as a driven oscillator, relying on the gear train to provide torque to maintain its motion against air resistance. The gear train must balance the torque to prevent excessive arc increases while overcoming losses. The discussion also raises a question about the impact of pendulum length on downstream gears when the escapement is repositioned. Overall, the torque dynamics remain consistent regardless of pendulum length.
jryer
Messages
20
Reaction score
1
Does the gear train in a classic weight driven clock see a torque decrease when we lengthen the pendulum?

thanks guys for your help - (inventor question)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you asking this as a physics question or as a design question?

The physics version would be: "How would lengthening the part of the pendulum below the pivot point change the torque delivered by the escapement"

The design question would be: "How would lengthening the part of the pendulum below the pivot point change the torque required from the escapement".
 
jbriggs444 said:
Are you asking this as a physics question or as a design question?

The physics version would be: "How would lengthening the part of the pendulum below the pivot point change the torque delivered by the escapement"

The design question would be: "How would lengthening the part of the pendulum below the pivot point change the torque required from the escapement".

The first one - "How would lengthening the part of the pendulum below the pivot point change the torque delivered by the escapement; would it increase or decrease?"

Also, I'm assuming the change in the torque delivered is transferred (seen/realized) to the gear train, is this a correct assumption?
 
Possibly we are still speaking at cross-purposes.

To my way of thinking, the pendulum is a driven oscillator. It does not apply torque to the gear train. The gear train applies torque to it. In the absence of any applied torque, it would continue move back and forth in an arc that slowly decreases over time due primarily to air resistance.

The gear train has to provide enough torque to overcome the losses due to air resistance. But it must not provide so much so that the pendulum's arc increases too greatly. [The escapement assures that this torque is applied in proper synchronization with the pendulum's motion].

So my answer is that the torque applied by the gear train/escapement on the pendulum is unchanged by the length of the pendulum. From Newton's third law, the torque applied by the pendulum to the escapement/gear train is also unchanged.
 
jbriggs444 said:
Possibly we are still speaking at cross-purposes.

To my way of thinking, the pendulum is a driven oscillator. It does not apply torque to the gear train. The gear train applies torque to it. In the absence of any applied torque, it would continue move back and forth in an arc that slowly decreases over time due primarily to air resistance.

The gear train has to provide enough torque to overcome the losses due to air resistance. But it must not provide so much so that the pendulum's arc increases too greatly. [The escapement assures that this torque is applied in proper synchronization with the pendulum's motion].

So my answer is that the torque applied by the gear train/escapement on the pendulum is unchanged by the length of the pendulum. From Newton's third law, the torque applied by the pendulum to the escapement/gear train is also unchanged.

JBriggs, take a look at this link

http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/gadgets/clocks-watches/clock4.htm

What happens if we put the escapement/pendulum assembly between the blue (1st) and purple (2nd) gears? Now does lengthening the pendulum affect the torque on the downstream gears (purple, green, and plum gears)?

thanks again
 
Bump. Anyone care to contribute on the 7:50pm post? thanks again
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top