How Do You Calculate Investment Percentage Changes Correctly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter grandnat_6
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Loss
AI Thread Summary
To calculate investment percentage changes, the percentage change is always relative to the initial amount. A decrease from $10,000 to $9,500 represents a 5% loss, calculated as ($9,500 - $10,000) / $10,000. Conversely, an increase from $9,500 to $10,000 reflects a 5.26% gain, calculated as ($10,000 - $9,500) / $9,500. Both calculations yield correct results but differ because they reference different starting points. Understanding this distinction is crucial for accurately assessing investment performance.
grandnat_6
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I think I confused myself. Must be working too hard or something.

I trying to find the percentage gain or loss of an investment.

example:

1. orginal investment $10000.00 today $9,500.00

9,500.00/10,000.00 = .95*100 = 95%

Therefore I have 95% of my orginal amount or (100%-95%)= 5% loss.

10,000.00*-5%= -500

10,000.00-500= 9,500.00

Or:

10,000.00-9,500.00= 500.00

500.00/9,500.00= .05263*100=5.263%

9500*5.263=500

500+9,500.00= 10,000.00

Please straighten me out on this! They both seem to get me the correct answer but the percentages are different, which one is correct?

What if I started out with $9,500.00 and today it's $10,000.00?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
grandnat_6 said:
Hi,

I think I confused myself. Must be working too hard or something.

I trying to find the percentage gain or loss of an investment.

example:

1. orginal investment $10000.00 today $9,500.00

9,500.00/10,000.00 = .95*100 = 95%

Therefore I have 95% of my orginal amount or (100%-95%)= 5% loss.

10,000.00*-5%= -500

10,000.00-500= 9,500.00

Or:

10,000.00-9,500.00= 500.00

500.00/9,500.00= .05263*100=5.263%

9500*5.263=500

500+9,500.00= 10,000.00

Please straighten me out on this! They both seem to get me the correct answer but the percentages are different, which one is correct?

What if I started out with $9,500.00 and today it's $10,000.00?

Thanks.


UIt is not the same way up as way down in percentages:

if you began with $10,000.00 and after some time you have $9, 500.00 then you've lost 5% of your original invesment, as
$$\frac{9,500}{10,000}=0.05\Longrightarrow 0.05\cdot 100 \%=5\%\,\,\text{loss}$$
as the final amount is less than the first one.

Had you begun with $9,500.00 and after some time you had $10,000,, then you'd have won
$$\frac{10,000}{9,500}=1.05263\Longrightarrow (1-1.05263)\cdot 100\%=5.6263\%\,\,\text{profit}$$

DonAntonio
 
The "percentage change" is always relative to the initial amount. Going from 10000 to 9500 is a decrease of 500 so a percentage change of -500/10000= -.05 or -5% of 10000.

But an increase from 9500 up to 10000 is an increase of 500 and so a percentage change of 500/9500= .0526 or 5.26%.
 
Thanks for the help! I understand now.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top