MHB Percentages of success in basketball

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yankel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basketball
AI Thread Summary
A basketball player can end a game with a shooting percentage over 80% without having reached exactly 80% at any point during the game. The discussion revolves around the mathematical proof that if a player's success rate is below 80% at some time and above 80% at the end, there must be a point where the success rate equals 80%. The proof involves analyzing the player's success rate as a sequence of fractions and establishing that if the final success rate exceeds 80%, there exists an index where the rate equals 80%. The conclusion confirms that it is indeed possible for the player to skip the exact 80% mark during the game.
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I wasn't sure if this question should be placed here or on algebra forum, but it is related to probability, so I put it here.

A basketball player shoots several times during some time period in a game, and scores less than 80% of his shots (let's say after the first quarter, but the time doesn't really matters). At the end of the game, he scored more than 80% of his shots. Is it necessary that at some point during the game, his success was exactly 80% ?

My intuition say that the answer is no, because this is not a continuous function, but every example I tried setting up, showed that 80% was achieved. What do you think ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yankel said:
Hello all,

I wasn't sure if this question should be placed here or on algebra forum, but it is related to probability, so I put it here.

A basketball player shoots several times during some time period in a game, and scores less than 80% of his shots (let's say after the first quarter, but the time doesn't really matters). At the end of the game, he scored more than 80% of his shots. Is it necessary that at some point during the game, his success was exactly 80% ?

My intuition say that the answer is no, because this is not a continuous function, but every example I tried setting up, showed that 80% was achieved. What do you think ?

Your correct that the answer is no. In terms of finding an example to show this the easiest way is to find some fraction that is greater than and not equal to 80% where subtracting one from the numerator and one from the denominator is less than and not equal to 80%. In other words find a fraction such that making the last shot pushes them over 80% success and that before making the last shot they had less than 80% success.

Find an x,y such that
$$\frac{x}{y} > 80%$$ and
$$\frac{x-1}{y-1} < 80%$$
 
Actually, I think the claim is true. First, I tried some elementary examples and they appeared to be true so my intuition was that the claim should be true. Suppose that he shots $n$ times during the game, then each time he shots we can compute his succes rate. The game starts and he shots ... he scores, then his succes rate at that time is $1/1 = 100\%$. Suppose he shots again after a few minutes but misses then his succes rate is now $1/2 = 50\%$. So in fact, you can represent the game as a finite sequence
$$\left(\frac{a_i}{i}\right)_{i=1}^{n},$$
where the $a_i's$ are increasing by one but not necessarily each consecutive term.

Statement
The question can then be reformulated as: given that $a_n/n > (4/5)$ and at some point in the game $a_j/j < (4/5)$ for $j<n$. Does this imply that there exists an index $k$ such that $a_k /k = 0.8$ where $j<k<n$?

Proof
​The answer is yes. We have given $\displaystyle \frac{a_n}{n} > \frac{4}{5} > \frac{a_j}{j}$. Hence, $5a_n>4n$ and $5a_j < 4j$. Let $b_k=5a_k-4k$. As $a_{k+1}$ is either $a_k$ or $a_k+1$, we have $$b_{k+1}=5a_{k+1}-4k-4=\begin{cases}5a_k-4k-4&=b_k-4\quad \text{ or}\\5(a_k+1)-4k-4&=b_k+1\end{cases}$$Thus if the integer $b_k$ increases, it only increases in steps of $1$. From $b_j<0<b_n$ we see that there must be a ​first index $k$ between $j$ and $n$ for which $b_k\ge 0$. Then $b_k\le b_{k-1}+1$ and $b_{k-1}<0$, hence $b_k=0$ as desired.

Please, correct me if I am wrong.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top