Period of a mass spring system with 2 spring of same K(vert)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the period of a mass-spring system when two identical springs with the same spring constant (K) are attached in parallel. The initial period of the system is given by T1 = 2π√(m/k). When a second spring is added in parallel, the effective spring constant doubles, resulting in a new period T2 = T1/√2. This confirms that the addition of springs in parallel increases stiffness, leading to a shorter oscillation period.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Simple Harmonic Motion (SHM)
  • Knowledge of spring constants and their effects on oscillation
  • Familiarity with the formula for the period of a mass-spring system
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the effects of varying mass on the period of oscillation in mass-spring systems
  • Explore the concept of effective spring constants in parallel and series spring configurations
  • Learn about the relationship between natural frequency and oscillation period
  • Investigate real-world applications of mass-spring systems in engineering and physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, mechanical engineering, and anyone interested in the dynamics of oscillatory systems will benefit from this discussion.

Simon George
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
A mass attached to a spring is oscillating in Simple Harmonic Motion. If an other spring of same sprinc constant is attached parrallel to the other spring, what is the period of this new system (as a function of the initial period).

Here's what I did and have no idea if this is right:

For the first period, T1= 2*pi*sqrt(m/k)

For the second period, T2= 2*pi*sqrt(m/(2k))
T2=(2*pi*sqrt(m/k))/sqrt(2)
T2=T1/sqrt(2)

Is that right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sanity check:
Two springs in parallel are stiffer than either spring separately.
The stiffer the spring(s), the higher the natural frequency.
The higher the natural frequency, the shorter the period.

You can use a similar line of reasoning for changes in the mass.

And your math looks correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
7K