Permutations (with repetitions) problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a combinatorial problem involving the assignment of 6 jobs to 5 people, where each job is assigned to one person and each person must have at least one job. Participants explore the implications of different counting methods and the reasoning behind the correct answer.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various counting methods, including the original poster's approach of multiplying the number of available employees for each job. They question the validity of their reasoning and the implications of jobs being assigned to the same person.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the counting methods, with some participants expressing doubts about the correctness of the provided solution. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being examined, and guidance has been offered regarding the necessity of labeling jobs and people before counting.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of ensuring that jobs are not assigned to the same person in certain arrangements, which affects the counting process. The discussion also highlights the need to clarify assumptions about job assignments and the arbitrary nature of job numbering.

NatFex
Messages
26
Reaction score
3
Moved from a technical forum, so homework template missing

Homework Statement


[/B]
The question is phrased in the following way:

There are 6 jobs to be assigned to 5 people. Each job is assigned only to one person, and each person must have at least one job. How many different arrangements are there?

Homework Equations



In general, I would approach a selection of k objects from a total of n in the following way:

Permutations without repetition: n!/(n-k)!
Permutations with repetition: nk
Combinations without repetition: n!/((n-k)!k!) – I express this as nCr(n,k) below.

The Attempt at a Solution



Given those conditions, then it stands to reason that 4 people will have 1 job and someone will have 2.

I approached the problem by thinking about the number of possible employees for every job then multiplying it all out:

Job 1: 5 (all of them)
Job 2: 4
Job 3: 3
Job 4: 2
Job 5: 1
Job 6: 5 (allocated to someone who also did another job above)

5*4*3*2*1*5 = 5! * 5 = 600

This seemed to me like it should logically work. The job numbering is obviously arbitrary so this should take into account any assortment/ordering

However, the correct answer turned out to be 4! * nCr(6,2) = 360. The reasoning behind this revolves around splitting the problem into the first 4 jobs (hence the 4!), then, for the last 2 jobs, working out how many ways there are to select 2 jobs out of 6 for 1 person to do (hence 6 choose 2.)

This makes a little bit of sense, but not as much as my initially proposed solution. Can someone explain exactly where this succeeds and where mine falls short? Why is my number larger? What are the 'excess' possibilities it's counting? Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem with your counting method is that jobs 1 & 2 could be done by the same person.

That said, I don't agree with the "correct" answer.
 
PeroK said:
The problem with your counting method is that jobs 1 & 2 could be done by the same person.

That said, I don't agree with the "correct" answer.
Does it really matter if I arranged it as 5*4*3*2*1*5 or 5*5*4*3*2*1? (In the case of the latter, jobs 1 & 2 can be done by the same person, but given that multiplication is commutative and that, as I've said, the job numbering is arbitrary, does it make a difference?)

I would like to see your take on the correct answer, if you don't mind.

Thanks
 
NatFex said:
Does it really matter if I arranged it as 5*4*3*2*1*5 or 5*5*4*3*2*1? (In the case of the latter, jobs 1 & 2 can be done by the same person, but given that multiplication is commutative and that, as I've said, the job numbering is arbitrary, does it make a difference?)

I would like to see your take on the correct answer, if you don't mind.

Thanks
I would do it for 3 jobs and 2 people. It's easy to count them all. Then you can check whether your formula works.
 
PeroK said:
I would do it for 3 jobs and 2 people. It's easy to count them all. Then you can check whether your formula works.
Indeed it doesn't! Formula yields 4 whereas there are 6 countable solutions. However, all I'm alerted to is the fact that I'm wrong and not how/why. I realize this is much to ask, so any input is appreciated.
 
NatFex said:
Indeed it doesn't! Formula yields 4 whereas there are 6 countable solutions. However, all I'm alerted to is the fact that I'm wrong and not how/why. I realize this is much to ask, so any input is appreciated.
You must label the jobs and the people before you start. Then, you exclude the option of jobs 1 & 2 being done by the same person.

To help you, my starting point was to think that one person must do 2 jobs and the other 4 people must do 1 job each.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NatFex

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K