Permutations (with repetitions) problem

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
NatFex
Messages
26
Reaction score
3
Moved from a technical forum, so homework template missing

Homework Statement


[/B]
The question is phrased in the following way:

There are 6 jobs to be assigned to 5 people. Each job is assigned only to one person, and each person must have at least one job. How many different arrangements are there?

Homework Equations



In general, I would approach a selection of k objects from a total of n in the following way:

Permutations without repetition: n!/(n-k)!
Permutations with repetition: nk
Combinations without repetition: n!/((n-k)!k!) – I express this as nCr(n,k) below.

The Attempt at a Solution



Given those conditions, then it stands to reason that 4 people will have 1 job and someone will have 2.

I approached the problem by thinking about the number of possible employees for every job then multiplying it all out:

Job 1: 5 (all of them)
Job 2: 4
Job 3: 3
Job 4: 2
Job 5: 1
Job 6: 5 (allocated to someone who also did another job above)

5*4*3*2*1*5 = 5! * 5 = 600

This seemed to me like it should logically work. The job numbering is obviously arbitrary so this should take into account any assortment/ordering

However, the correct answer turned out to be 4! * nCr(6,2) = 360. The reasoning behind this revolves around splitting the problem into the first 4 jobs (hence the 4!), then, for the last 2 jobs, working out how many ways there are to select 2 jobs out of 6 for 1 person to do (hence 6 choose 2.)

This makes a little bit of sense, but not as much as my initially proposed solution. Can someone explain exactly where this succeeds and where mine falls short? Why is my number larger? What are the 'excess' possibilities it's counting? Thanks
 
Last edited:
on Phys.org
PeroK said:
The problem with your counting method is that jobs 1 & 2 could be done by the same person.

That said, I don't agree with the "correct" answer.
Does it really matter if I arranged it as 5*4*3*2*1*5 or 5*5*4*3*2*1? (In the case of the latter, jobs 1 & 2 can be done by the same person, but given that multiplication is commutative and that, as I've said, the job numbering is arbitrary, does it make a difference?)

I would like to see your take on the correct answer, if you don't mind.

Thanks
 
NatFex said:
Does it really matter if I arranged it as 5*4*3*2*1*5 or 5*5*4*3*2*1? (In the case of the latter, jobs 1 & 2 can be done by the same person, but given that multiplication is commutative and that, as I've said, the job numbering is arbitrary, does it make a difference?)

I would like to see your take on the correct answer, if you don't mind.

Thanks
I would do it for 3 jobs and 2 people. It's easy to count them all. Then you can check whether your formula works.
 
PeroK said:
I would do it for 3 jobs and 2 people. It's easy to count them all. Then you can check whether your formula works.
Indeed it doesn't! Formula yields 4 whereas there are 6 countable solutions. However, all I'm alerted to is the fact that I'm wrong and not how/why. I realize this is much to ask, so any input is appreciated.
 
NatFex said:
Indeed it doesn't! Formula yields 4 whereas there are 6 countable solutions. However, all I'm alerted to is the fact that I'm wrong and not how/why. I realize this is much to ask, so any input is appreciated.
You must label the jobs and the people before you start. Then, you exclude the option of jobs 1 & 2 being done by the same person.

To help you, my starting point was to think that one person must do 2 jobs and the other 4 people must do 1 job each.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NatFex