Perpetua mobile theoretical misunderstanding

  • Thread starter Thread starter joao_pimentel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mobile Theoretical
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the theoretical misunderstanding of perpetual motion machines, specifically regarding a scenario where a metal ball is accelerated by a tubular permanent magnet. The user acknowledges the conservative nature of magnetic fields but struggles to comprehend why the ball would not maintain acceleration after leaving the tube. They question the relationship between force, magnetic fields, and the ball's velocity, particularly when the ball is stationary. The conversation highlights the complexities of magnetic forces and the impossibility of perpetual motion, with a reminder that such machines are not discussed on the forum. Understanding the limitations of magnetic fields is crucial in addressing these misconceptions.
joao_pimentel
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
Hello

I was patent examiner on the Portuguese patent office for 3 years and we have a lot of perpetua mobile applications, so I wanted to find now, the theoretical misunderstanding I'm missing here

attachment.php?attachmentid=60799&stc=1&d=1376122111.png


Imagine you have a track (on a table, on the xOy plane) on which a metal ball would follow, and at a certain length of the track, there would be a tubular permanent magnet, that would create a force on the ball accelerating it. That ball would be accelerated every time it passes through the tube!

I know that there is some paradox on my lemma, but I can't find where

Thank you in advance

PS: Actually I know that the magnetic field is conservative, but something is missing
 

Attachments

  • moto_cont.png
    moto_cont.png
    2.6 KB · Views: 528
Physics news on Phys.org
The tube will not accelerate the ball around the track. I'm not sure what will happen inside the tube since the flux is so uniform, but once the ball leaves the tube it will be attracted right back to it.
 
That's what I can't understand because every time I see images of magnetic field I see this

310px-Earths_Magnetic_Field_Confusion.svg.png


By the way, I know that the force is F=q(E + v\times B)

But how to relate the Force created by the magnetic field of a permenant magnet if the ball is stopped, v=0, and there is no Electric field

You said the ball would came back, but can't we shield the field, so the field just applies inside the tube.

Sorry, too many questions
 
Last edited:
Sorry, but we do not discuss perpetual motion machines on PF.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top