What Is Wrong with My Approach to Solving This Electrostatics Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar_4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrostatics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving an electrostatics problem involving a charge density that varies as 1/r within a sphere of radius R. The user attempts to apply Gauss's law to find the electric field (E) and potential (Φ) but encounters issues with unit consistency and the dependence of E on r. It is pointed out that the proportionality constant for the charge density must be determined to ensure correct units, as it influences the calculation of total charge. Additionally, it is noted that the electric field inside the region is constant in magnitude but varies in direction. The user seeks clarification on these points to resolve their confusion.
quasar_4
Messages
273
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This should be simple: We have a charge density in some region of space, r< R (R is some known constant), that goes like 1/r. Everywhere else, the charge density is zero. I need to find the electric field and potential everywhere. The total charge is Q, assumed to be known.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I don't see why I can't just use Gauss's law to find E and integrate to find Phi.

For r>R, the problem is really simple: the total enclosed charge is Q, so
\vec{E(r)} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon0 r^2} \hat{r}

potential is just \Phi = \frac{-Q}{4 \pi \epsilon0 r}

For r <R, we draw a Gaussian surface of radius r. Then Gauss's law should give

E (4 \pi r^2) = Q_{enc}/\epsilon0 = \frac{4 \pi}{\epsilon0} \int_0^r r^2 \frac{1}{r} dr = 2 \pi r^2 \rightarrow \vec{E(r)} = \frac{1}{2 \epsilon0} \hat{r}

Potential would be:

\Phi = - \int_R^r E \cdot dl = - \int_R^r \frac{1}{2 \epsilon0} dr = \frac{-(r-R)}{2 \epsilon0}

So, these don't seem correct to me at all. E has no r-dependence, and worse, the wrong units! What am I doing wrong here? Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The charge density inside R is proportional to 1/r, but you need to calculate the proportionality constant, which will have units of charge/area (since this constant divide by r has units of charge/volume). This will fix the units. In fact the E-field is constant in magnitude (but not in direction) inside R.
 
Thank you!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top