Persistence of a knotted Abrikosov vortex

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hornbein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vortex
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the persistence of a knotted Abrikosov vortex within a Type II superconductor. It is established that the core of the vortex is not superconducting, leading to energy dissipation, and there is no supercurrent within the vortex itself. The system tends to minimize the volume of vortex cores due to the higher energy state of the non-superconducting core compared to the surrounding superconducting state. Vortices can be pinned by defects, which reduces energy loss, but knotted vortices are likely to shrink and vanish unless they are strongly pinned.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Type II superconductors
  • Knowledge of Abrikosov vortex dynamics
  • Familiarity with superconducting and non-superconducting states
  • Concept of vortex pinning in superconductors
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanisms of vortex pinning in Type II superconductors
  • Explore the implications of vortex dynamics on superconducting properties
  • Study the mathematical modeling of knotted vortices in superconductors
  • Investigate the energy dissipation processes in non-superconducting vortex cores
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and researchers focusing on superconductivity and vortex dynamics in Type II superconductors.

Hornbein
Gold Member
Messages
3,936
Reaction score
3,157
Suppose we have a Type II superconductor that contains a knotted Abrikosov vortex. How long can we expect this to persist? I read that the the core of the vortex is not superconducting, so energy would be dissipated. But how about the supercurrent? Once it got started, what would stop it? So I dunno.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The core of a vortex is indeed not superconducting, that is why you can have a magnetic field in there.

This implies that there is also no supercurrent within the vortex.

Nevertheless, the non-SC state within the vortex has a higher energy than the SC state around it, so the system will try to minimize the volume fraction of vortex cores. Vortices either get pinned on defects where SC is weakened anyways (hence less energy lost), and loops, wiggles, etc in vortices get straightened out.

I don't know if and how you can tie a know into a vortex line (I'd appreciate if you could post an image of a bowline :-) ), but I suppose they would shrink and vanish unless strongly pinned.

If you draw a loop around a vortex - antivortex pair (magnetic field pointing up and down, resp.), then the net flux through this loop is zero and hence there is no net supercurrent around the pair. The currents around the two vortices compensate each other.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
5K