Person falls on mattress: draw speed-time graph

  • Thread starter Thread starter alingy1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph
AI Thread Summary
A person falling from a height of 4 meters onto a mattress will experience an increase in speed due to gravity until contact is made. Upon hitting the mattress, the speed continues to increase until the force exerted by the mattress equals the person's weight, indicating no discontinuity in velocity. The discussion raises questions about the mattress's properties and whether air resistance can be ignored. It is suggested that the motion may resemble a mass-spring system, potentially leading to oscillation rather than coming to rest immediately. Understanding the force-time graph's shape is crucial for accurately drawing the speed-time graph.
alingy1
Messages
325
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A person falls on a mattress from 4 meters. The mattress does not make him bounce. Draw the speed-time graph.


Homework Equations


Speed-time graph principles.


The Attempt at a Solution


I know the first part is a linear function, where the speed increases, because of gravity. However, the moment when the person touches the mattress and thereafter, I'm not sure what happens. We have learned Hooke's law. Should it be a curved line like the left branch of a x^2 function? I think when the person touches the mattress, the mattress increases the deceleration of the person because of Hooke's law? What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. is the distance fallen through the air short enough to ignore air resistance?
2. is the mattress inner-sprung? How does it matter?
3. what does it mean, for the mattress, that the person does not bounce

What level is this at?
It could be that you are over-thinking the graph and you only need to show an appropriately curved line ... i.e. what happens to the acceleration after hitting the mattress?
 
I think what the problem is looking for you to show is that the speed continues to increase even after initial contact with the mattress until the force provided by the mattress is equal to the weight of the object. In other word, there is no discontinuity in the velocity.
 
Will the person die? (this is serious physics question)

Something about impulsive force ._.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps "the person does not bounce" means that he or she does not loose contact with the mattress, meaning that after touching the mattress, you can say that the motion is the same as if the person were on a spring. In that case you have the first part where the speed is increasing linearly and the second part where it oscilates.
 
@mlicen: so your interpretation would be that the person+mattress can be treated as a mass+spring system?
Doesn;t that mean that, after impact, the person would execute simple harmonic motion? (i.e. not come to rest?)

However - it is more important for me to see what @alingy1 thinks about this - unless you are doing the same problem in the same course?

@coconut62: from a 4m fall - unlikely. Even without the mattress, you'd have to land funny.
The area under the force-time graph is the specific impulse - but what you need to avoid injury is to spread the curve out in time as much as you can. For a short fall, with no funny twists in the fall, no hitting your head (or other spots) on something hard, then you want to make sure that your internal organs don't get damaged in the deceleration. This is all stuff stunt-coordinators need to know about.

For a simple collision, the force-time graph is an inverted parabola - which should nicely tell OP what they need to draw the v-t graph. There are a lot of subtleties that could go into this graph though, so context is quite important.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top