Personal epiphany about Taylor theorem, true?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Reverberant
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Taylor Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers around the application of integration by parts in the context of the Taylor series expansion. The user claims that integrating the remainder of a Taylor series expansion (of order n-1) n-1 times will result in the cancellation of all terms except for the function f(x), leading to the equation f(x) = f(x). This claim is confirmed by another participant, who provides detailed steps and notation for the integration process, affirming the correctness of the user's assertion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Taylor series and their expansions
  • Familiarity with integration by parts technique
  • Knowledge of calculus, specifically derivatives and integrals
  • Ability to interpret mathematical notation and expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Taylor series and their remainders
  • Learn advanced integration techniques, including multiple applications of integration by parts
  • Explore the implications of Taylor series in approximation theory
  • Investigate the convergence of Taylor series for different functions
USEFUL FOR

Students in calculus courses, educators teaching mathematical analysis, and anyone interested in deepening their understanding of Taylor series and integration techniques.

Reverberant
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm taking my first calculus course right now, and something struck me regarding the remainder in integral form of a Taylor series expansion:

Let's say we have a Taylor expansion of the (n-1):th order, which has a remainder of the form

238fexl.png


Now, my claim is that if we integrate by parts n-1 times (I think), then every term of the integrated remainder, except for the last one, will cancel out a term of the Taylor polynomial; leaving only f(x). Thus, all we have left is the equation f(x)=f(x).

Is this true, and if so, can you confirm that the form of integration by parts to be used is
2u5zryc.png

and not
35q3npa.png

?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Reverberant said:
Hello,

I'm taking my first calculus course right now, and something struck me regarding the remainder in integral form of a Taylor series expansion:

Let's say we have a Taylor expansion of the (n-1):th order, which has a remainder of the form

238fexl.png


Now, my claim is that if we integrate by parts n-1 times (I think), then every term of the integrated remainder, except for the last one, will cancel out a term of the Taylor polynomial; leaving only f(x). Thus, all we have left is the equation f(x)=f(x).

Is this true, and ...

Thanks in advance!
Just do it.

[tex]\displaystyle \text{We use the notation, } f^{(n)}(t)={{d^n}\over{dt^n}}f(t)\,.[/tex]

[tex]\displaystyle \text{Let } u= (x-t)^{n-1}\ \to \ {{d}\over{dt}}u=-(n-1)(x-t)^{n-2}\,.\ \ \text{Let } dv=f^{(n)}(t)}\, dt\ \to \ v=f^{(n-1)}(t)(n-1)(x-t)^{n-2}\,.[/tex]

[tex]\displaystyle {{1}\over{n!}}\int_a^x{n(x-t)^{n-1}\,f^{(n)}(t)}\, dt[/tex] [tex]\displaystyle = {{1}\over{(n-1)!}}\left(\left[ (x-t)^{n-1}f^{(n-1)}(t)\right]_a^x - \int_a^x{-(n-1)(x-t)^{n-2}\,f^{(n-1)}(t)}\, dt \right)[/tex]


[tex]\displaystyle = {{0\cdot f^{(n-1)}(x)-(x-a)^{n-1}f^{(n-1)}(a)}\over{(n-1)!}}\,+\,{{1}\over{(n-1)!}}\left( \int_a^x{(n-1)(x-t)^{n-2}\,f^{(n-1)}(t)}\, dt \right)[/tex]

[tex]\displaystyle = \,-\,{{(x-a)^{n-1}f^{(n-1)}(a)}\over{(n-1)!}}\,+\,{{1}\over{(n-1)!}}\left( \int_a^x{(n-1)(x-t)^{n-2}\,f^{(n-1)}(t)}\, dt \right)[/tex]
This will subtract the (n-1)th order term of the Taylor expansion of f(x) and leave a Taylor expansion of the (n-2)th order plus the integral which is the remainder.

So, yes your claim is correct!
 
Last edited:
Sweet, thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K