PGRE: Exam Evolution 1986-Present

  • Thread starter Thread starter hochenergie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Evolution Pgre
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the evolution of the Physics Graduate Record Examination (PGRE) since its inception in 1986, focusing on the changes in exam style and content over the years. Participants note that while older exams, particularly those from before the early 1990s, tend to be more challenging, the 2001 exam closely resembles the current format and difficulty level. It is suggested that the 2001 exam serves as a reliable benchmark for gauging the current test's difficulty. Test-takers recount experiences of significant discrepancies between practice exams and the actual test, with some noting that recent exams have not shown a marked increase in difficulty compared to practice materials. Effective test-taking strategies, such as skipping difficult questions, are also emphasized as crucial for achieving better scores.
hochenergie
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The ETS released exams date back to 86. Have the exams changed much in style or content throughout the years? Surely, the older exams are worth working through, but are the "newer'' exams like 96 or 01 more like the exams administered in the past few years?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
probably
 
I took the PGRE in October 2009 and it was very similar to the 2001 exam in content and difficulty.
 
The 2001 exam is most like today's PGRE's

The others should still be used as material for prep, but use 2001 to gauge the difficulty of the current test. The older ones are, on average, harder.
 
I have been told that the tests got much harder in the early 1990's. One thing I remember when I took the PGRE's with the very rude shock that I got when the test was much, much harder than any of the practice tests.
 
I took the PGRE 2-3 years ago, and I really didn't notice any difference in difficulty between the practice exams and the one I took. After getting my test-taking skills in order after the first practice exam (just skip the question if you don't know it cold, don't look for your error if your answer isn't one of the options, etc.), I scored roughly the same on all of them.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?
Back
Top