PH of buffer with addition of conjugate base

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the pH of a buffer solution consisting of acetic acid and sodium acetate after adding sodium acetate. The initial concentrations are 0.100 M for both components, and 0.0900 mol of sodium acetate is added. Participants emphasize using the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, noting that only the concentration of the conjugate base (sodium acetate) changes while the acid concentration remains constant. There is confusion regarding the calculations, particularly with the equilibrium constant and the resulting hydrogen ion concentration. Ultimately, the correct approach involves adjusting only the base concentration in the equation to find the new pH.
Maharg
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider 1L of a solution that is 0.100 M in acetic acid and 0.100 M in sodium acetate. What will the pH be, when 0.0900 mol of sodium acetate are added?
Ignore changes in volume.

acetic acid pka = 1.75 E-5

Homework Equations



HA --> H+ + A-
pH=pka +log A-/HA


The Attempt at a Solution



I had similar questions that I know how to do with strong acids. The difference in this question is that the added acid/base is a weak one. With the strong base addition I can just add it to A- concentration and subtract it from HA and use Henderson-Hasselbach equation.

This one I tried that but the numbers I know are off. I also tried doing ka = H+*(0.1+.009)/0.1

Solving for H+ and then using that to find out concentrations of A- and HA but the H+ number is far too small to make a difference and I'm fairly sure I can't just add the conjugate bases together.

Can someone please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maharg said:
I also tried doing ka = H+*(0.1+.009)/0.1

0.009? * instead of log? This is a correct approach, just check your math.
 
Borek said:
0.009? * instead of log? This is a correct approach, just check your math.

Oops I made it a mistake, anyways when I did my math I just did 1.75E-5 = H+(0.19)/0.1

I get 9.2E-6

but I have no idea what to do with this. If I do it the same way as a strong base question I would add it to the A- concentration and subtract it from HA, but this value is too small to make a difference to a 0.1 M.
 
You have added conjugate base - so change only base concentration, acid concentration is untouched. Simply plug numbers into HH equation.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top