What Is the Resulting pH of Mixing These Solutions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Qube
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mixture Ph
AI Thread Summary
Mixing a 200 mL solution with H3O+ concentration of 1 * 10^{-4} and a 100 mL solution with H3O+ concentration of 2 * 10^{-11} leads to confusion regarding the resulting pH. Initial calculations suggest a pH of approximately 4, but the key indicates a pH of about 10, implying a basic solution. The discrepancy arises from not accounting for the autoionization of water, which contributes additional hydronium ions. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the nature of the solutions and suggests that the problem lacks clarity regarding the compounds involved. Accurate pH determination requires considering both the acid and base characteristics of the mixed solutions.
Qube
Gold Member
Messages
461
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



You mix the below two solutions. What is the resulting pH?

200 mL solution with H_{3}O^{+} = 1 * 10^{-4}
100 mL solution with H_{3}O^{+} = 2 * 10^{-11}

Homework Equations



pH = -log[H_{3}O^{+}]

N_{H_{3}O^{+}} = M * L

The Attempt at a Solution



I first found the number of moles of hydronium ion on each of the two solutions by multiplying volume in liters by the molarity of the solution. For the first solution, the number of moles of hydronium ion is 2 * 10^{-5}. The second solution has 2 * 10^{-12} moles of hydronium ion.

I added the number of moles of hydronium ion and divided by the volume of the mixture - 300 mL or 0.3 L. This yields the new hydronium ion molarity.

I then took the negative logarithm of the hydronium ion molarity and found the pH to be approximately 4.

However, the key says the pH is instead approximately 10, which I noticed to be 14 - 4 (pK_{w} = 14 = pH + pHO).

Why is the solution basic instead of acidic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Qube said:

Homework Statement



You mix the below two solutions. What is the resulting pH?

200 mL solution with H_{3}O^{+} = 1 * 10^{-4}
100 mL solution with H_{3}O^{+} = 2 * 10^{-11}

Homework Equations



pH = -log[H_{3}O^{+}]

N_{H_{3}O^{+}} = M * L

The Attempt at a Solution



I first found the number of moles of hydronium ion on each of the two solutions by multiplying volume in liters by the molarity of the solution. For the first solution, the number of moles of hydronium ion is 2 * 10^{-5}. The second solution has 2 * 10^{-12} moles of hydronium ion.

I added the number of moles of hydronium ion and divided by the volume of the mixture - 300 mL or 0.3 L. This yields the new hydronium ion molarity.

I then took the negative logarithm of the hydronium ion molarity and found the pH to be approximately 4.

However, the key says the pH is instead approximately 10, which I noticed to be 14 - 4 (pK_{w} = 14 = pH + pHO).

Why is the solution basic instead of acidic?

You were drawn maybe by the wording into thinking oh that's just water with this and other water with that H3O+ concentration. But water is water for which [H3O+] is 10-7. So what you've got in those solutions is dilute acid and dilute alkali. First think how acid one and how alkaline the other is and you will see which of the answers, yours or the official one, is reasonable.

Suppose the one is HCl and the other is NaOH and work out the pH. I get 10.
 
Hmm, so I forgot the auto ionization of water. But wouldn't that be included in the hydronium ion concentrations given? Or should I add 10^-7 for each solution?
 
Actually this problem is faulty and has no reasonable answer as worded. It doesn't say anything about the other compounds in the solution, which is a crucial thing.

I can construct for you example with solutions that will give after mixing ANY pH between 4 and 10.7. Name pH and I will tell you how to do it. Seriously.
 
That's true, I just made the simplest assumption about what the solutions were, which turns out to give the stated right answer.
It should also have been stated they were 10-4 M etc.

Quite often on this forum we have to guess what the questions really were. :biggrin:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top