Phase change of reflected wave - is there a polarization dependence?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the phase change of light waves upon reflection at a glass surface, specifically examining the polarization dependence using the Fresnel equations. At normal incidence (theta = 0 degrees), the reflection coefficients rp and rs are calculated as 0.2 and -0.2, respectively, indicating no phase shift for p-polarized light and a 180-degree phase shift for s-polarized light. The conclusion drawn is that the phase shift does depend on polarization, particularly at non-normal incidence, where circularly polarized light becomes linearly polarized at the Brewster angle.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fresnel equations
  • Knowledge of light wave polarization types (s-polarization and p-polarization)
  • Familiarity with the concept of Brewster angle
  • Basic principles of electromagnetic wave behavior at interfaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of Fresnel equations in optics
  • Explore the implications of Brewster angle on light polarization
  • Investigate the behavior of circularly polarized light upon reflection
  • Learn about the effects of varying angles of incidence on phase shifts
USEFUL FOR

Optics researchers, physicists, and engineers involved in photonics and wave propagation who seek to understand the nuances of light behavior at material interfaces.

jeic
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Does a light wave in air (n1 = 1) that is reflected off a glass surface (n2=1.5) experience a 180deg phase change? Looking at the Fresnel equations (theta = 0deg) I learn that:

according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fresnel_equations

rp = (n2-n1)/(n1+n2) = 0.2 and rs = (n1-n2)/(n1+n2) = -0.2

rp indicates no phase shift, while rs does indicate at 180 deg phase shift (rs is negative).

Intuitively, the phase shift should not depend on polarization at normal incidence (theta = 0deg). How do I understand the above formulas? What if the polarization is circular?
 
Science news on Phys.org
For normal incidence, all incident waves have, effectively, the same (horizontal) polarisation because the field vectors are parallel with the plane of the reflecting surface. It's just a consequence of 'feeling' the geometry. Distinguishing between HP and VP is easy for large angles of incidence (glancing contact) but the parallel component of an incident VP wave gets larger as the angle of incidence approaches zero and the normal component goes to zero.

After reflection for non-normal incidence, circularly polarised EM is no longer circular. At the Brewster angle, the polarisation becomes Plane.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
895
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K